...
首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Radiology >Image quality and radiation dose in 256-slice cardiac computed tomography: comparison of prospective versus retrospective image acquisition protocols.
【24h】

Image quality and radiation dose in 256-slice cardiac computed tomography: comparison of prospective versus retrospective image acquisition protocols.

机译:256片心脏计算机断层扫描中的图像质量和辐射剂量:前瞻性和回顾性图像采集协议的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

PURPOSE: To assess coronary artery image quality and patient radiation exposure in patients who underwent clinically indicated 256-slice CTA. METHODS: Consecutive patients (n=193) underwent 256-slice CTA, using (1) retrospective gating without radiation dose modulation, (2) retrospective gating with radiation dose modulation and (3) prospective gating. Image quality was determined by consensus of two experienced observers using a 5-grade scale. The effective dose was calculated. RESULTS: In all patients, CTA was performed without adverse events. Retrospective CTA was assessed in 39 patients with and 39 without dose modulation, while 115 patients underwent prospective CTA. Heart rate was related to image quality with all protocols (r=0.46, p<0.001). Up to a heart rate of 75 bpm no significant difference in overall image quality was observed for all three protocols, while no significant differences could be observed between retrospective CTA with and without dose modulation for any segments or heart rates. Prospective and retrospective CTA with dose modulation showed radiation savings of approximately 75 % and approximately 30 %, respectively compared to retrospective CTA without dose modulation (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with heart rates up to 75 bpm prospective CTA should be the first choice acquisition protocol. For heart rates >75 bpm, retrospective CTA with dose modulation should be considered.
机译:目的:评估接受临床指示的256层CTA的患者的冠状动脉图像质量和患者的放射线暴露。方法:连续患者(n = 193)接受256层CTA检查,方法是:(1)无辐射剂量调节的回顾性门控;(2)有辐射剂量调节的回顾性门控;(3)前瞻性门控。图像质量是由两个经验丰富的观察者使用5级量表达成的共识。计算有效剂量。结果:在所有患者中,CTA均未发生不良事件。回顾性CTA评估了39例有剂量调节的患者和39例未进行剂量调节的患者,而115例患者接受了前瞻性CTA。在所有方案中,心率均与图像质量有关(r = 0.46,p <0.001)。最高心律为75 bpm时,所有三种方案的总体图像质量均未观察到显着差异,而回顾性CTA在有或无剂量调制的任何节段或心率中均未观察到显着差异。与没有剂量调节的回顾性CTA相比,具有剂量调节的预期CTA和回顾性CTA分别节省了约75%和约30%的辐射(p <0.001)。结论:对于心率高达75 bpm的患者,前瞻性CTA应该是首选的获取方案。对于> 75 bpm的心率,应考虑采用剂量调节的回顾性CTA。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号