...
首页> 外文期刊>European journal of gastroenterology and hepatology >Hangzhou criteria for liver transplantation in hepatocellular carcinoma: A single-center experience
【24h】

Hangzhou criteria for liver transplantation in hepatocellular carcinoma: A single-center experience

机译:杭州市肝癌肝移植标准:单中心经验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The inclusion criteria for liver transplantation (LT) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are being expanded, and the Hangzhou criteria are the most accepted criteria in China. The aim of our study was to evaluate the Hangzhou criteria for LT in HCC with respect to the Milan criteria. METHODS: We retrospectively collected data of 298 cases of LT in HCC in our center from August 2000 to December 2010, and then divided these patients into three groups according to the tumor characteristics: the Milan criteria group (n=97), the Hangzhou criteria group (n=172), and the out of Hangzhou criteria group (n=126). We compared the baseline characteristics and outcome of these three groups of patients. RESULTS: Baseline patient characteristics showed no significant difference among the three groups, except for younger age in the out of Hangzhou group (P<0.05). Overall the 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 91.8, 88.7, and 86.6%, respectively, for the Milan criteria group; 86.6, 76.7, and 73.8% for the Hangzhou criteria group; and 76.2, 57.1, and 56.3% for the out of Hangzhou criteria group (P<0.05). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year tumor-free survival rates were 88.7, 86.6, and 86.6%, respectively, for the Milan criteria group; 83.7, 73.8, and 73.3% for the Hangzhou criteria group (P=0.014); and 63.5, 48.4, and 48.4% for the out of Hangzhou group, which was significantly lower than the rates in the other two groups (P=0.000). CONCLUSION: Although the Hangzhou criteria lead to lower overall survival and tumor-free survival rates compared with the Milan criteria, the Hangzhou criteria indicate more HCC patients for LT and are associated with a considerable long-term outcome. The Hangzhou criteria should be accepted as the inclusion criteria for LT in HCC.
机译:背景与目的:肝癌(HCC)肝移植(LT)的纳入标准正在扩大,杭州标准是中国最受欢迎的标准。我们研究的目的是相对于米兰标准评估HCC杭州的LT标准。方法:回顾性分析我中心2000年8月至2010年12月收治的298例肝癌LT患者的资料,根据肿瘤特点将其分为三类:米兰标准组(n = 97),杭州标准组(n = 172)和杭州以外的标准组(n = 126)。我们比较了这三组患者的基线特征和预后。结果:除杭州市外年龄较年轻外,三组的基线患者特征无显着差异(P <0.05)。总体而言,米兰标准组的1年,3年和5年生存率分别为91.8、88.7和86.6%;杭州标准组为86.6、76.7和73.8%;杭州市以外的标准组分别为76.2、57.1和56.3%(P <0.05)。米兰标准组的1年,3年和5年无瘤生存率分别为88.7、86.6和86.6%;杭州标准组为83.7%,73.8%和73.3%(P = 0.014);杭州市以外地区的比例分别为63.5%,48.4%和48.4%,显着低于其他两组(P = 0.000)。结论:尽管与米兰标准相比,杭州标准导致较低的总体生存率和无肿瘤生存率,但杭州标准表明LT的肝癌患者更多,并与相当长的长期预后相关。杭州标准应作为肝癌肝癌纳入标准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号