首页> 外文期刊>European journal of pain : >Changes in trends and pattern of strong opioid prescribing in primary care
【24h】

Changes in trends and pattern of strong opioid prescribing in primary care

机译:初级保健中强阿片类药物处方的趋势和模式的变化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background This study evaluated the prescribing trends of four commonly prescribed strong opioids in primary care and explored utilization in non-cancer and cancer users. Methods This cross-sectional study was conducted from 2000 to 2010 using the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink. Prescriptions of buprenorphine, fentanyl, morphine and oxycodone issued to adult patients were included in this study. Opioid prescriptions issued after patients had cancer medical codes were defined as cancer-related use; otherwise, they were considered non-cancer use. Annual number of prescriptions and patients, defined daily dose (DDD/1000 inhabitants/day) and oral morphine equivalent (OMEQ) dose were measured in repeat cross-sectional estimates. Results In total, there were 2,672,022 prescriptions (87.8% for non-cancer) of strong opioids for 178,692 users (59.9% female, 83.9% non-cancer, mean age 67.1-±-17.0 years) during the study period. The mean annual (DDD/1000 inhabitants/day) was higher in the non-cancer group than in the cancer group for all four opioids; morphine (0.73-±-0.28 vs. 0.12-±-0.04), fentanyl (0.46-±-0.29 vs. 0.06-±-0.24), oxycodone (0.24-±-0.19 vs. 0.038-±-0.028) and buprenorphine (0.23-±-0.15 vs. 0.008-±-0.006). The highest proportion of patients were prescribed low opioid doses (OMEQ-≤-50-mg/day) in both non-cancer (50.3%) and cancer (39.9%) groups, followed by the dose ranks of 51-100-mg/day (26.2% vs. 28.7%), 101-200-mg/day (15.1% vs. 19.2%) and >200-mg/day (8.25% vs. 12.1%). Conclusions There has been a huge increase in strong opioid prescribing in the United Kingdom, with the majority of prescriptions for non-cancer pain. Morphine was the most frequently prescribed, but the utilization of oxycodone, buprenorphine and fentanyl increased markedly over time.
机译:背景本研究评估了四种通常处方的强效阿片类药物在基层医疗中的处方趋势,并探讨了在非癌症和癌症使用者中的使用情况。方法采用英国临床实践研究数据链,于2000年至2010年进行了横断面研究。这项研究包括向成年患者发放的丁丙诺啡,芬太尼,吗啡和羟考酮的处方。患者具有癌症医学规范后发布的阿片类药物处方被定义为与癌症相关的用途;否则,它们被视为非癌症用途。在重复的横断面估计中测量处方和患者的年度数量,确定的日剂量(DDD / 1000居民/天)和口服吗啡当量(OMEQ)剂量。结果在研究期间,共有178,692名使用者(女性59.9%,非癌症83.9%,平均年龄67.1-±-17.0岁)使用了2,672,022张强阿片类药物处方(非癌症类药物占87.8%)。在所有四个阿片类药物中,非癌症组的平均年均收入(DDD / 1000居民/天)高于癌症组。吗啡(0.73-±-0.28 vs.0.12-±-0.04),芬太尼(0.46-±-0.29 vs.0.06-±-0.24),羟考酮(0.24-±-0.19 vs.0.038-±-0.028)和丁丙诺啡( 0.23-±-0.15与0.008-±-0.006)。非癌症组(50.3%)和癌症组(39.9%)的处方阿片类药物剂量最低的患者(OMEQ-≤-50mg/天)比例最高,其次是51-100 mg / mg每日(26.2%比28.7%),101-200毫克/天(15.1%比19.2%)和> 200毫克/天(8.25%比12.1%)。结论在英国,阿片类药物的处方量已大大增加,其中大多数处方用于非癌性疼痛。吗啡是最常用的处方药,但是随着时间的推移,羟考酮,丁丙诺啡和芬太尼的利用率显着增加。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号