首页> 外文期刊>European journal of pain : >Diagnostic criteria for CRPS I: differences between patient profiles using three different diagnostic sets.
【24h】

Diagnostic criteria for CRPS I: differences between patient profiles using three different diagnostic sets.

机译:CRPS I的诊断标准:使用三个不同的诊断集的患者资料之间的差异。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Complex Regional Pain Syndrome type I (CRPS I) is an illness which usually occurs due to major or minor tissue injury to the extremities. Because a unique pathophysiological mechanism for CRPS I has not yet been established, the diagnosis is based on observation and measurement of clinical symptoms and signs. In this study, a comparison was made between three sets of diagnostic criteria (the IASP, Bruehl et al. and Veldman et al.) based on patient reports and physicians' assessments of signs and symptoms associated with CRPS I, in 372 outpatients suspected of having CRPS I. Agreement between CRPS I diagnosis among the three sets was poor (kappa-range: 0.29-0.42), leading to positive CRPS I diagnoses according to Veldman et al.'s criteria in 218 cases (59%), according to the IASP in 268 cases (72%), and according to Bruehl et al. in 129 cases (35%). Significant differences in patient profiles were found between the diagnostic sets for the number of patients reporting continuing disproportionate pain, larger area affected than the initial trauma (both p<0.001), increase of symptoms due to exercise (p=0.009), edema (p=0.015), temperature asymmetry (p=0.015), hyperesthesia, allodynia (both p<0.001) and hyperalgesia (p=0.036). Similarly, significant differences emerged for physicians' observations of hyperesthesia and allodynia (both p<0.001). Highest combined values of sensitivity (SE) and specificity (SP) for the strongest cases of presence (n=108) or absence (n=62) of CRPS I were found for reported hyperesthesia (SE+SP:165%), allodynia (160%), observed color asymmetry (162%), hyperesthesia (157%), temperature asymmetry (154%) and edema (152%). The lack of agreement between the different diagnostic sets for CRPS I and the different clinical profiles that result from it may lead to different therapeutic and study populations, hampering adequate treatment and scientific development for this illness. We propose explicit reference to diagnostic criteria used in studies, and registration in trials of a broad variety of CRPS I features, as used in this study, to make subgroup phenotyping and post hoc analyses based on different diagnostic criteria possible.
机译:I型复杂区域疼痛综合症(CRPS I)是一种疾病,通常是由于四肢严重或轻度组织损伤而发生。由于尚未建立CRPS I的独特病理生理机制,因此诊断基于对临床症状和体征的观察和测量。在这项研究中,在372例疑似门诊患者中,根据患者报告和医师对与CRPS I相关的体征和症状的评估,对三组诊断标准(IASP,Bruehl等人和Veldman等人)进行了比较。三组中CRPS I诊断之间的一致性差(kappa范围:0.29-0.42),根据Veldman等人的标准,在218例患者中诊断为CRPS I阳性(59%)。根据Bruehl等人的资料,有268例(72%)的IASP。 129例(35%)。在诊断组之间发现的患者状况存在显着差异,报告持续疼痛不成比例的患者数量,受影响范围比初始创伤大(均p <0.001),运动引起的症状增加(p = 0.009),水肿(p = 0.015),温度不对称(p = 0.015),感觉异常,异常性疼痛(均p <0.001)和痛觉过敏(p = 0.036)。同样,医师对感觉异常和异常性疼痛的观察也出现了显着差异(均p <0.001)。对于报告的感觉异常(SE + SP:165%),异常性疼痛(SE + SP:165%)的最强案例(n = 108)或不存在(n = 62)的CRPS I最强的病例,其敏感性(SE)和特异性(SP)的最高组合值160%),观察到的颜色不对称(162%),感觉异常(157%),温度不对称(154%)和浮肿(152%)。 CRPS I的不同诊断集与由此产生的不同临床特征之间缺乏一致性,可能导致不同的治疗和研究人群,从而妨碍了对该疾病的充分治疗和科学发展。我们提议明确参考研究中使用的诊断标准,并在本研究中使用的各种CRPS I功能的试验注册,以使基于不同诊断标准的亚型表型和事后分析成为可能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号