...
首页> 外文期刊>European journal of pediatrics >Utility of near-infrared light devices for pediatric peripheral intravenous cannulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

Utility of near-infrared light devices for pediatric peripheral intravenous cannulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:近红外光设备在小儿外周静脉插管中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We investigated the utility of near-infrared (NIR) light devices for peripheral intravenous cannulation (PIVC) in pediatric patients. We searched three databases, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane CENTRAL. Randomized controlled trials that compared PIVC using NIR light devices and the "traditional" method (with no assistive device) were included. The primary outcome was a failure rate at the first attempt, and the effect size was measured by the risk ratio for failure. Subgroup analysis was performed according to control group risk for failure at first attempt as an indicator of difficult procedure (low vs. high). Eleven studies were included in the meta-analysis. There was no significant difference in the primary outcome between the two methods (risk ratio 1.03, confidence interval 0.89-1.20, I (2) = 48 %). In a subgroup analysis, the subgroup difference between subsets of low and high control group risk was significant (I (2) = 83 %). In the subset of the high control group risk, using NIR light devices showed a lower risk for failure than the traditional method (risk ratio 0.81, confidence interval 0.64-1.01, I (2) = 0 %).
机译:我们调查了近红外(NIR)照明设备在小儿患者外周静脉插管(PIVC)中的实用性。我们搜索了MEDLINE,EMBASE和Cochrane CENTRAL这三个数据库。包括比较使用NIR照明设备和“传统”方法(无辅助设备)的PIVC的随机对照试验。主要结果是首次尝试的失败率,其影响大小通过失败的风险比来衡量。根据对照组首次尝试失败的风险进行亚组分析,作为困难手术的指标(低与高)。荟萃分析包括11项研究。两种方法之间的主要结局无显着差异(风险比1.03,置信区间0.89-1.20,I(2)= 48%)。在亚组分析中,低和高对照组风险的子集之间的亚组差异显着(I(2)= 83%)。在高对照组风险的子集中,与传统方法相比,使用NIR照明设备显示出较低的失败风险(风险比0.81,置信区间0.64-1.01,I(2)= 0%)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号