首页> 外文期刊>European journal of cancer care >On the dangers of methodolatry, moral hazard and myopia in research.
【24h】

On the dangers of methodolatry, moral hazard and myopia in research.

机译:研究方法论,道德风险和近视的危险。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

We are probably all familiar with the uncanny ability of politicians to form diametrically opposed interpretations about an issue from the same set of statistics in order to support their own political stance or viewpoint. This has led to the now ubiquitous phrase 'lies, damned lies or statistics', but the problem often lies in the interpretation of the data rather than the data itself as my reference to the selective myopia of politicians clearly testifies. It would of course be nice to think that scientists do not behave in such a way, but it seems a unique feature of our species that each of us may be afflicted by a blinkered mindset from time to time.
机译:我们可能都熟悉政治家为支持同一政治立场或观点而对来自同一组统计数据的问题形成完全相反的解释的超强能力。这导致了现在到处都是的“谎言,该死的谎言或统计数据”,但是问题往往在于数据的解释,而不是数据本身,因为我对政治家选择性近视的引用清楚地证明了这一点。认为科学家们不会以这种方式行事当然会很好,但是似乎我们物种的一个独特特征是我们每个人都可能不时被眨眼的思维所困扰。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号