首页> 外文期刊>European journal of cancer care >Do Greek healthcare users and healthcare providers share cancer care priorities? Analysing the results from two Delphi studies.
【24h】

Do Greek healthcare users and healthcare providers share cancer care priorities? Analysing the results from two Delphi studies.

机译:希腊医疗保健用户和医疗保健提供者是否共享癌症治疗优先事项?分析来自两个Delphi研究的结果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Traditionally healthcare providers have determined how healthcare resources should be allocated. However, in recent years, healthcare users have increasingly been invited to identify those priorities important to them. Yet, healthcare users' priorities do not always match the priorities set by healthcare providers. In Greece, there has not been any research to measure the extent of agreement between healthcare providers and users on cancer care priorities. This project aimed to identify the priorities of healthcare users and providers with regards to the areas of cancer care that needed to be developed or improved in Greece and to examine the extent of agreement between the two groups. Two parallel Delphi surveys were conducted to identify the priorities and arrive at a consensus. Thirty participants formed the panel of healthcare providers and 30 participants the panel of healthcare users. The participants identified 18 key cancer care areas that require development or improvement; however, there were significant differences on the prioritisation between the two panels. It is encouraging that 18 key areas were shared by both panels. These areas can form an agenda for further exploration. Healthcare users can participate in developing priorities for cancer care; however, education is required so that they are better able to make informed choices.
机译:传统上,医疗保健提供者已经确定了如何分配医疗保健资源。但是,近年来,越来越多地邀请医疗保健用户确定对他们重要的那些优先事项。但是,医疗保健用户的优先级并不总是与医疗保健提供者设置的优先级匹配。在希腊,没有任何研究可以衡量医疗保健提供者与使用者之间就癌症治疗优先事项达成的协议程度。该项目旨在确定在希腊需要发展或改善的癌症护理领域中,医疗保健用户和提供者的优先事项,并研究两组之间的协议程度。进行了两次平行的德尔菲调查,以确定优先事项并达成共识。 30名参与者组成了医疗保健提供者小组,30名参与者组成了医疗保健用户小组。参与者确定了18个需要发展或改善的关键癌症护理领域;但是,两个小组的优先次序存在显着差异。令人鼓舞的是,两个小组共享了18个关键领域。这些领域可以构成进一步探索的议程。医疗保健使用者可以参与制定癌症护理的优先事项;但是,需要进行教育,以便他们能够更好地做出明智的选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号