...
首页> 外文期刊>European journal of clinical pharmacology >A comparison of repaglinide and glibenclamide in the treatment of type 2 diabetic patients previously treated with sulphonylureas.
【24h】

A comparison of repaglinide and glibenclamide in the treatment of type 2 diabetic patients previously treated with sulphonylureas.

机译:瑞格列奈和格列本脲治疗以前用磺脲类药物治疗的2型糖尿病患者的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of repaglinide, a novel oral prandial glucose regulator, with that of glibenclamide, an oral hypoglycaemic agent, in the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: This was a 14-week, double-blind, parallel-group trail in which a total of 195 type 2 diabetic patients treated with oral hypoglycaemic agents were randomized to receive either repaglinide, administered preprandially three times daily, or glibenclamide, given preprandially once or twice daily, as per manufacturer's recommendations. RESULTS: By the end of the study, the 2-h postprandial blood glucose values were lower in the repaglinide group than in the glibenclamide group, with the difference approaching statistical significance (repaglinide, 8.1 (0.6) mol x l(-1) vs glibenclamide, 9.1 (0.6)mmol x l(-1); P = 0.07). There was no statistically significant difference in the mean blood glucose level at the end of the study between the two groups (repaglinide, 7.1 (0.5) mmol x l(-1) vs glibenclamide, 7.4 (0.5) mmol x l(-1); P = 0.42), and baseline HbA1c values had decreased to the same degree in both the repaglinide [7.8% (0.1%) to 7.5% 0.1%)] and the glibenclamide groups [8.0 (0.1%) to 7.6 (0.1%)]. There are no significant differences between the repaglinide and glibenclamide treatment groups in the levels of fasting blood glucose, fructosamine, fasting C-peptide, insulin and proinsulin. Neither treatment group showed any clinically significant changes in blood lipid profiles. Repaglinide and glibenclamide were both well tolerated. No significant differences were observed between the two treatment groups with respect to adverse events, including hypoglycaemic episodes and weight change. No accumulation of repaglinide was apparent during the maintenance period. CONCLUSION: Repaglinide is as well tolerated as glibenclamide and is equally effective in the management of type 2 diabetes. Repaglinide may, however, offer an improvement in postprandial blood glucose control compared with glibenclamide, thereby helping to reduce the relative long-term risk of diabetic complications.
机译:目的:比较新型口服膳食葡萄糖调节剂瑞格列奈与口服降血糖药格列本脲治疗2型糖尿病的疗效和安全性。方法:这是一个为期14周的双盲平行组研究,其中总共195名接受口服降糖药治疗的2型糖尿病患者被随机分配接受瑞格列奈,每日餐前3次或格列苯脲治疗。每天一次或两次,按照制造商的建议。结果:到研究结束时,瑞格列奈组的2 h餐后血糖值低于格列本脲组,且差异具有统计学意义(瑞格列奈,8.1(0.6)mol xl(-1)与格列本脲,9.1(0.6)mmol xl(-1); P = 0.07)。两组之间的平均血糖水平在研究结束时无统计学差异(瑞格列奈,7.1(0.5)mmol xl(-1)与格列本脲,7.4(0.5)mmol xl(-1); P = 0.42),瑞格列奈[7.8%(0.1%)至7.5%0.1%)]和格列本脲组[8.0(0.1%)至7.6(0.1%)]的基线HbA1c值均下降至相同程度。瑞格列奈和格列本脲治疗组之间的空腹血糖,果糖胺,空腹C肽,胰岛素和胰岛素原水平无显着差异。两个治疗组均未显示出血脂谱的任何临床显着变化。瑞格列奈和格列本脲均耐受良好。就不良事件(包括降血糖事件和体重变化)而言,两个治疗组之间未观察到显着差异。在维持期间没有明显的瑞格列奈的积聚。结论:瑞格列奈的耐受性与格列本脲一样好,在治疗2型糖尿病方面同样有效。然而,与格列本脲相比,瑞格列奈可以改善餐后血糖控制,从而有助于降低糖尿病并发症的相对长期风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号