...
首页> 外文期刊>European journal of clinical microbiology and infectious diseases: Official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology >Immuno-PCR for the early serological diagnosis of acute infectious diseases: The Q fever paradigm
【24h】

Immuno-PCR for the early serological diagnosis of acute infectious diseases: The Q fever paradigm

机译:免疫PCR在急性感染性疾病早期血清学诊断中的应用:Q发热范例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

To reduce the delay in diagnosis of Q fever, we have adapted the ultrasensitive immuno-PCR method for the detection of Phase II IgM anti-Coxiella burnetii. We compared its performance to ELISA, IFA and PCR using 31 acute Q fever sera and 50 control sera. The best sensitivity was obtained by iPCR (27 out of 31) followed by PCR (18 out of 31), ELISA (12 out of 31) and IFA (10 out of 31). A specificity of 92% was found by iPCR (3 false positive out of 40), 92% for ELISA (3 false positive out of 40) whereas PCR and IFA exhibited a specificity of 100%. Among the 31 Q fever sera, we compared the four methods for the detection of the early sera sampled during the two first weeks after the onset of symptoms and found a sensitivity of 90% by iPCR, 55% for PCR, 35% for ELISA and 25% for IFA. The results presented in this study suggest that iPCR is a promising, sensitive and specific method that can be used for the early diagnosis of acute Q fever and more generally for acute infections where traditional methods lack sensitivity.
机译:为了减少Q发热的诊断延迟,我们采用了超灵敏的免疫PCR方法来检测II期IgM抗柯氏杆菌。我们将其性能与ELISA,IFA和PCR的性能进行了比较,使用31种急性Q发热血清和50种对照血清。通过iPCR(31个中的27个),PCR(31个中的18个),ELISA(31个中的12个)和IFA(31个中的10个)获得最佳灵敏度。 iPCR的特异性为92%(40个中有3个假阳性),ELISA的特异性为92%(40个中有3个假阳性),而PCR和IFA的特异性为100%。在31例Q发热血清中,我们比较了症状发作后头两周的四种检测早期血清的方法,发现iPCR的敏感性为90%,PCR的敏感性为55%,ELISA的敏感性为35%, IFA为25%。这项研究提出的结果表明,iPCR是一种有前途的,灵敏且特异的方法,可用于急性Q发热的早期诊断,更广泛地用于传统方法缺乏敏感性的急性感染。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号