...
首页> 外文期刊>European journal of anaesthesiology >Pain relief and motor function during continuous interscalene analgesia after open shoulder surgery: a prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison between levobupivacaine 0.25%, and ropivacaine 0.25% or 0.4%.
【24h】

Pain relief and motor function during continuous interscalene analgesia after open shoulder surgery: a prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison between levobupivacaine 0.25%, and ropivacaine 0.25% or 0.4%.

机译:开胸手术后连续肌间沟镇痛期间的疼痛缓解和运动功能:左旋布比卡因0.25%和罗哌卡因0.25%或0.4%之间的前瞻性,随机,双盲比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To compare pain relief and motor impairment of 0.25% levobupivacaine with either an equivalent (0.25%) or equipotent (0.4%) concentration of ropivacaine for continuous interscalene block after open shoulder surgery. METHODS: Seventy-two adult patients scheduled for elective major shoulder surgery received an interscalene injection of mepivacaine 1.5% 30 mL followed by 24 h patient-controlled interscalene analgesia (basal infusion rate: 5 mL h-1; incremental bolus: 2 mL; lockout period: 10 min; maximum boluses per hour: 4) with either 0.25% levobupivacaine (n = 24), 0.25% ropivacaine (n = 24) or 0.4% ropivacaine (n = 24). A blinded observer recorded the evolution of pain relief and recovery of motor block during the first 24 h. Motor function was assessed as the maximum pressure developed while squeezing a sphygmomanometer cuff with the blocked hand. The reduction from preoperative values was considered as an index of motor impairment. RESULTS: No differences were reported among the three groups in the quality of postoperative analgesia. The number of incremental patient-controlled interscalene analgesia doses, total volume of local anaesthetic infused during the 24-h patient-controlled interscalene analgesia, and number of rescue ketoprofen analgesia were higher in the ropivacaine 0.25% group than in the other two groups (P = 0.0005). The hand strength recovered to >or=90% of baseline values within the first 24 h of infusion in all groups, without differences among the three groups. CONCLUSION: When providing patient-controlled interscalene analgesia after open shoulder surgery 0.25% levobupivacaine and 0.4% ropivacaine performed equally in terms of pain relief, motor block and number of patient-controlled boluses required, while patients receiving 0.25% ropivacaine needed significantly more boluses and rescue analgesia to control their pain.
机译:背景与目的:比较0.25%左旋布比卡因与等效浓度(0.25%)或当量(0.4%)浓度的罗哌卡因用于开放性肩间手术后连续性肌钙蛋白阻滞的疼痛缓解和运动障碍。方法:预定进行择期大肩关节手术的72名成年患者接受了1.5%30%盐酸米非卡因的斜肌内注射,然后进行24小时患者控制的斜肌间镇痛(基础输注速率:5 mL h-1;推注剂量:2 mL;锁定)时间:10分钟;每小时最大推注次数:4)0.25%左旋布比卡因(n = 24),0.25%罗哌卡因(n = 24)或0.4%罗哌卡因(n = 24)。失明的观察者记录了最初24小时内疼痛缓解和运动障碍恢复的过程。运动功能被评估为用阻塞的手挤压血压计袖带时产生的最大压力。术前值的降低被认为是运动障碍的指标。结果:三组之间在术后镇痛质量上无差异。罗哌卡因0.25%组的患者控制性增量肌钙蛋白镇痛剂量的增加次数,24小时患者控制性肌钙蛋白间镇痛过程中输注的局部麻醉药的总量以及酮洛芬的挽救性镇痛的数量均高于其他两组(P = 0.25%) = 0.0005)。在所有输注的最初24小时内,手的力量恢复到基线值的>或= 90%,三组之间没有差异。结论:在开胸手术后提供患者控制的肌间角膜镇痛时,就缓解疼痛,运动阻滞和需要患者控制的推注次数而言,0.25%左旋布比卡因和0.4%罗哌卡因的效果均相同,而接受0.25%罗哌卡因的患者则需要更多的推注和抢救镇痛以控制疼痛。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号