首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging >Infarct size in primary angioplasty without on-site cardiac surgical backup versus transferal to a tertiary center: a single photon emission computed tomography study.
【24h】

Infarct size in primary angioplasty without on-site cardiac surgical backup versus transferal to a tertiary center: a single photon emission computed tomography study.

机译:无需现场心脏手术支持并转移至三级中心的原发性血管成形术中的梗塞面积:单光子发射计算机断层扫描研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) performed in large community hospitals without cardiac surgery back-up facilities (off-site) reduces door-to-balloon time compared with emergency transferal to tertiary interventional centers (on-site). The present study was performed to explore whether off-site PCI for acute myocardial infarction results in reduced infarct size. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred twenty-eight patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction were randomly assigned to undergo primary PCI at the off-site center (n = 68) or to transferal to an on-site center (n = 60). Three days after PCI, (99m)Tc-sestamibi SPECT was performed to estimate infarct size. Off-site PCI significantly reduced door-to-balloon time compared with on-site PCI (94 +/- 54 versus 125 +/- 59 min, respectively, p < 0.01), although symptoms-to-treatment time was only insignificantly reduced (257 +/- 211 versus 286 +/- 146 min, respectively, p = 0.39). Infarct size was comparable between treatment centers (16 +/- 15 versus 14 +/- 12%, respectively p = 0.35). Multivariate analysis revealed that TIMI 0/1 flow grade at initial coronary angiography (OR 3.125, 95% CI 1.17-8.33, p = 0.023), anterior wall localization of the myocardial infarction (OR 3.44, 95% CI 1.38-8.55, p < 0.01), and development of pathological Q-waves (OR 5.07, 95% CI 2.10-12.25, p < 0.01) were independent predictors of an infarct size > 12%. CONCLUSIONS: Off-site PCI reduces door-to-balloon time compared with transferal to a remote on-site interventional center but does not reduce infarct size. Instead, pre-PCI TIMI 0/1 flow, anterior wall infarct localization, and development of Q-waves are more important predictors of infarct size.
机译:背景:在大型社区医院中进行无心脏手术后备设施(场外)的初级经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI),与紧急转移到第三级介入中心(现场)相比,减少了上气球时间。进行本研究以探讨针对急性心肌梗塞的非现场PCI是否可减少梗塞面积。方法和结果:128例急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者被随机分配到异地中心接受原发性PCI(n = 68)或转移至异地中心(n = 60)。 。 PCI后三天,进行(99m)Tc-sestamibi SPECT评估梗死面积。与现场PCI相比,非现场PCI显着减少了上门到气球的时间(分别为94 +/- 54和125 +/- 59分钟,p <0.01),尽管症状到治疗的时间仅显着减少(分别为257 +/- 211分钟和286 +/- 146分钟,p = 0.39)。治疗中心之间的梗死面积相当(16 +/- 15%对14 +/- 12%,p = 0.35)。多变量分析显示,在初次冠状动脉造影时,TIMI 0/1血流等级(OR 3.125,95%CI 1.17-8.33,p = 0.023),心肌梗死的前壁定位(OR 3.44,95%CI 1.38-8.55,p < 0.01)和病理性Q波的发展(OR 5.07,95%CI 2.10-12.25,p <0.01)是梗死面积> 12%的独立预测因子。结论:与转移到远程现场介入中心相比,非现场PCI减少了上门到气球的时间,但并未减小梗塞面积。取而代之的是,PCI前TIMI 0/1流量,前壁梗塞定位和Q波发展是更重要的梗塞面积预测指标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号