首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Agronomy >A survey on actual agricultural practices and their effects on the mineral nitrogen concentration of the soil solution.
【24h】

A survey on actual agricultural practices and their effects on the mineral nitrogen concentration of the soil solution.

机译:关于实际农业实践及其对土壤溶液中矿质氮浓度影响的调查。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

A study was conducted to assess the N fertilizer efficiency in four private farms in intensively cropped areas of NW Italy, and to monitor the effects of agricultural practices on the mineral N concentration of the soil solution, sampled every 2 weeks for 2 years and considered as an indicator of potential leaching. Two cultivation systems were compared in each farm, one involving continuous maize rotation, the other assuring a continuous soil cover (permanent meadow or winter cereal-maize double cropping system). The fertilization level in the arable crops was high (369-509 kg N ha-1 year-1) compared to the crop removals, and resulted in a low efficiency, as indicated by the four examined efficiency indexes (calculated N surplus, N removal-fertilizer ratio, N apparent recovery, N use efficiency). The soil-water-nitrate concentration showed large temporal variations in the range of 1-150 mg litre-1 for five out of the eight cropping situations, while concentrations smaller than 10 mg litre-1 werealways recorded in the meadows and in one of the four soils (Aeric Epiaquept). The fertilizer management that characterized each cropping system affected the soil-mineral-nitrate content in shallow arable soils. The longer soil cover duration in double-cropping systems did not result in a reduction of soil N compared to maize as a single crop, not even in winter (the bare-soil intercropping period in maize-based systems). However, the temporal oscillations of the concentration were buffered by the cropcover duration and by the presence of a shallow water table (1 m deep) in the soil profile. The average nitrate content of the soil could be predicted by the N uptake of the crop, the N removal:fertilizer ratio, the soil pH and sand content. However, nosimple explanatory relationship was found with the experimental factors. Hence, in farm conditions, in the absence of sufficient data for a deterministic model approach, the target of reducing the risk of leaching should be achieved by maximizing the fertilizer efficiency.
机译:进行了一项研究,以评估意大利西北部集约种植区的四个私人农场的氮肥效率,并监测农业实践对土壤溶液中矿质氮浓度的影响,每2周取样2年,并视为潜在浸出的指标。在每个农场中比较了两种耕作系统,一种涉及连续的玉米轮作,另一种确保连续的土壤覆盖(永久性草地或冬季谷物-玉米双作系统)。与农作物的清除相比,可耕作物的施肥水平较高(369-509 kg N ha-1 year-1),导致效率低下,这是通过四个检验的效率指标(计算得出的氮过剩,氮去除)得出的。 -肥料比例,N表观回收率,N利用效率)。在八种耕作中,有五种土壤水硝酸盐的浓度在1-150 mg litre-1的范围内显示出较大的时间变化,而在草地和其中一种土壤中,总记录的浓度小于10 mg litre-1。四种土壤(Aeric Epiaquept)。每种耕作制度都有的肥料管理方法会影响浅层可耕土壤中的土壤-硝酸盐含量。与单作玉米相比,双作系统中较长的土壤覆盖时间不会导致土壤氮的减少,甚至在冬天(以玉米为基础的系统中的裸土间作期)也是如此。但是,浓度的时间波动受到作物覆盖持续时间和土壤剖面中浅层地下水位(1 m深)的影响。土壤的平均硝酸盐含量可以通过农作物对氮的吸收,氮的去除量与肥料的比例,土壤的pH值和沙含量来预测。然而,没有发现与实验因素的简单解释关系。因此,在农场条件下,在缺乏确定性模型方法的足够数据的情况下,应通过最大限度地提高肥料利用率来实现降低浸出风险的目标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号