...
首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Agronomy >Ecological intensification of rice production in the lowlands of Amazonia - options for smallholder rice producers.
【24h】

Ecological intensification of rice production in the lowlands of Amazonia - options for smallholder rice producers.

机译:亚马孙低地稻米生产的生态集约化-小农稻米生产者的选择。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study reports on two consecutive years of experimentation to evaluate ecological intensification options for smallholder irrigated rice production on an alluvial-marine soil in the eastern periphery of Amazonia. The 2007 system-comparison trial contrasts management packages of the System of Rice Intensification (SRI) with 'conventional' irrigated rice (CIR). In a bi-factorial layout, we compare SRI and CIR under low (10 Mg cow manure ha-1) and high (10 Mg manure+additional 100 kg N ha-1 as urea) fertilizer regimes. The 2008 factor-comparison trial investigated the relative effects of three key rice intensification management components: (i) aerobic-moist (as opposed to anaerobic-flooded) water regime, (ii) low-density transplanting (as opposed to high-density direct seeding), and (iii) organic (as opposed to synthetic) fertilization. Weed management was not investigated and therefore standardized to manual weeding. Since a full factorial scheme (3x3 treatments) was not feasible, we compare SRI and conventional management components under the conditions we deemed most relevant for irrigated rice in our region and beyond. System-comparison indicates higher grain yield of CRI than of SRI, both at low (+21%) and at high (+9%) fertilizer levels. SRI was associated with strong increases in tillering and in individual plant biomass which almost compensated for the low plant density, as well as an increased plant height and a wider root:shoot ratio. However, the conventional treatments positively affected the final grain-filling stage, with increased numbers of filled grains per panicle, weight of 1000 grains and - ultimately - grain production. Factor comparison (i) does not support the idea of beneficial effects of an aerobic water regime and (ii) dispenses the necessity of an organic fertilizer regime, but (iii) does indicate significant benefits of low-density transplanting over direct-seeding, an important management feature for Amazonian smallholder irrigated rice farming.
机译:这项研究报告了连续两年的实验,以评估亚马逊河东缘冲积海洋土壤上小农灌溉水稻生产的生态集约化方案。 2007年的系统比较试验将稻米集约化系统(SRI)与“常规”灌溉稻米(CIR)的管理软件包进行了对比。在双要素布局中,我们比较了低(10 Mg牛粪ha -1 )和高(10 Mg粪肥+100 kg N ha -1 作为尿素)肥料制度。 2008年的因子比较试验研究了水稻强化集约管理的三个关键方面的相对影响:(i)有氧湿润(相对于厌氧淹没)水情,(ii)低密度移栽(相对于高密度直接灌溉)播种),以及(iii)有机(与合成相反)施肥。没有对杂草管理进行调查,因此将其标准化为人工除草。由于无法采用完整的析因方案(3x3处理),因此我们在我们认为与本地区及其他地区的灌溉水稻最相关的条件下,比较了SRI和常规管理措施。系统比较表明,在低(+ 21%)和高(+ 9%)肥料水平下,CRI的谷物产量均高于SRI。 SRI与分till和单个植物生物量的强劲增加有关,这几乎弥补了低植物密度,植物高度增加和更宽的根:茎比的问题。但是,常规处理对最终的谷物填充阶段产生了积极的影响,每穗的填充谷物数量增加,1000粒谷物的重量增加,最终谷物产量增加。要素比较(i)不支持有氧水管理制度的有益效果的想法,并且(ii)取消了有机肥料制度的必要性,但是(iii)确实表明了低密度移栽优于直接播种,亚马逊小农户灌溉水稻的重要管理功能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号