...
首页> 外文期刊>European Heart Journal: The Journal of the European Society of Cardiology >Should duration of dual antiplatelet therapy depend on the type and/or potency of implanted stent? A pre-specified analysis from the PROlonging Dual antiplatelet treatment after Grading stent-induced Intimal hyperplasia studY (PRODIGY)
【24h】

Should duration of dual antiplatelet therapy depend on the type and/or potency of implanted stent? A pre-specified analysis from the PROlonging Dual antiplatelet treatment after Grading stent-induced Intimal hyperplasia studY (PRODIGY)

机译:双重抗血小板治疗的持续时间是否应取决于植入支架的类型和/或效力?分级支架诱发的内膜增生研究(PRODIGY)后延长双抗血小板治疗的预分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

AimsThe purpose of this pre-specified analysis of the PROlonging Dual antiplatelet treatment after Grading stent-induced Intimal hyperplasia studY (PRODIGY) was to assess device-specific outcomes relative to different duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after Everolimus- (EES), Paclitaxel (PES), Zotarolimus- (ZES-S) eluting, or bare metal stents (BMS).Methods and resultsWe randomized 2013 patients to BMS, ZES-S, PES, or EES implantation. At 30 days, each stent group underwent up to 6 or 24 months clopidogrel therapy. The primary endpoint, which was a composite of death, myocardial infarction, or cerebrovascular accident, did not differ in patients receiving BMS [HR: 0.89 (95%CI: 0.54-1.45)], PES [HR: 0.74 (95%CI: 0.43-1.25)], or EES [HR: 0.63 (95%CI: 0.33-1.21)] implantation across DAPT groups, whereas it was significantly higher in ZES-S patients undergoing long when compared with short-term DAPT therapy (HR: 2.85, P = 0.0018), with positive interaction testing (P-value = 0.004). At the 6-month landmark analysis, heterogeneity across stent types persisted for the primary study endpoint and other secondary clinical outcomes, whereas patients receiving PES showed a significantly higher rate of definite, probable and definite, probable, possible stent thrombosis in the short DAPT regimen. No association in absolute or relative terms was noted between stent potency in inhibiting intimal hyperplasia and greater vulnerability to shorter DAPT therapy.ConclusionOur study suggests that optimal duration of DAPT may be stent-specific and it does not support a clear association between stent potency and vulnerability to shorter DAPT therapy.Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00611286. http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00611286?term= prodigy&rank=2. All rights reserved. ? The Author 2013.
机译:目的这项针对Grading支架诱发的内膜增生研究(PRODIGY)后延长双重抗血小板治疗的预先分析的目的是评估依维莫司(EES)后不同双重抗血小板治疗(DAPT)持续时间的设备特定结果,紫杉醇(PES),佐他莫司(ZES-S)洗脱或裸金属支架(BMS)方法和结果我们将2013年患者随机分为BMS,ZES-S,PES或EES植入。在第30天,每个支架组均接受长达6或24个月的氯吡格雷治疗。主要终点是死亡,心肌梗塞或脑血管意外的综合症状,接受BMS的患者无差异[HR:0.89(95%CI:0.54-1.45)],PES [HR:0.74(95%CI: 0.43-1.25)]或EES [HR:0.63(95%CI:0.33-1.21)]植入DAPT组,而长期服用ZES-S的患者与短期DAPT治疗相比明显更高(HR: 2.85,P = 0.0018),并具有积极的交互作用测试(P值= 0.004)。在为期6个月的里程碑式分析中,主要研究终点和其他次要临床结局的支架类型之间仍然存在异质性,而接受PES的患者在短期DAPT方案中显示出明确,可能和确定,可能的支架血栓形成的比率明显更高。结论:抑制内膜增生的支架效能与较短的DAPT治疗的更大脆弱性之间没有绝对或相对联系。结论我们的研究表明,DAPT的最佳持续时间可能是支架特异性的,并且不支持支架效能与脆弱性之间的明确关联缩短DAPT治疗时间。临床注册临床试验.gov标识符:NCT00611286。 http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00611286?term= prodigy&rank = 2。版权所有。 ?作者2013。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号