首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Infrared and Millimeter Waves >Modified tunneladder slow-wave structures for high-power millimeter-wave TWTs
【24h】

Modified tunneladder slow-wave structures for high-power millimeter-wave TWTs

机译:大功率毫米波TWT的改良隧道加法器慢波结构

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this paper, five modified Tunneladder slow-wave structures (SWS), the ridge-loaded stub-supported meander line with circular electron tunnel (CET-RSML), ring-plane frame line (RPFL), the ridge-loaded thick ladder line (RLTLL), the ridge-loaded pole-piece folded-waveguide circuit (RLPFWL), and the double-period Tunneladder line (DPTL) were discussed. The dispersion characteristics and the interaction impedances of the five modified Tunneladder SWS were calculated by simulation and the corresponding analytic models. The calculation results explain that the CET-RSML and the RLTLL hold wider bandwidth in comparison with the Tunneladder, when the volume dimensional lengths are same. When the bandwidth is definite, the interaction impedance of RLTLL can be higher than Tunneladder, but that of CET-RSML can't. The dispersion curves of the RLPFWL and the DPTL are more linear in comparison with Tunneladder, but the interaction impedances are very low.
机译:本文研究了五种改进的Tunneladder慢波结构(SWS),带有圆形电子隧道的脊梁式存根弯折线(CET-RSML),环形平面框架线(RPFL),脊梁式厚梯形线(RLTLL),脊形加载极靴折叠式波导电路(RLPFWL)和双周期Tunneladder线(DPTL)进行了讨论。通过仿真和相应的分析模型,计算了五个改进的Tunneladder SWS的色散特性和相互作用阻抗。计算结果说明,当体积尺寸长度相同时,CET-RSML和RLTLL与Tunneladder相比具有更宽的带宽。当带宽确定时,RLTLL的交互阻抗可以高于Tunneladder,而CET-RSML则不能。与Tunneladder相比,RLPFWL和DPTL的色散曲线更为线性,但相互作用阻抗非常低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号