...
首页> 外文期刊>EuroIntervention: journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology >Single-vessel or multivessel PCI in patients with multivessel disease presenting with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes
【24h】

Single-vessel or multivessel PCI in patients with multivessel disease presenting with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes

机译:患有非ST段抬高的急性冠脉综合征的多支血管疾病患者的单支血管或多支血管PCI

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Aims: Coronary artery disease is often diffuse and patients with non-ST-segment acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS) demonstrate multivessel coronary disease. The purpose of this study was to clarify whether interventions on stable chronic non-culprit lesions in patients with NSTE-ACS can prevent future adverse events. Methods and results: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 990 consecutive patients who underwent either single-vessel PCI (SVPCI: n=379) or multivessel PCI (MVPCI: n=611) in a setting of NSTE-ACS. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was performed to compensate for differences in baseline characteristics between the groups. To minimise the impact of confounding factors, we performed propensity matching (SVPCI: n=230, MVPCI: n=230). Patients who had MVPCI had a lower rate of prior interventional treatment or myocardial infarction, and more complex lesions than patients with SVPCI. At three years, all-cause mortality was significantly lower in the MVPCI group than the SVPCI group (13.0% vs. 18.3%, p=0.02, adjusted HR 0.55, 95% CI: 0.38-0.80), while the rates of target vessel revascularisation and a composite of all-cause death or myocardial infarction were not different between the groups. In the propensitymatched cohort, all-cause death remained significantly lower in the MVPCI group (adjusted HR 0.41, 95% CI: 0.22-0.75) compared to the SVPCI group. Conclusions: In this retrospective study, multivessel PCI reduced all-cause mortality in a setting of NSTEACS compared to single-vessel PCI. Further investigations to confirm these results are warranted.
机译:目的:冠状动脉疾病通常是弥漫性的,非ST段急性冠状动脉综合征(NSTE-ACS)患者表现出多支冠状动脉疾病。这项研究的目的是阐明对NSTE-ACS患者稳定的慢性非罪犯病变进行干预是否可以预防未来的不良事件。方法和结果:我们进行了一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象是990例在NSTE-ACS环境中接受单支血管PCI(SVPCI:n = 379)或多支血管PCI(MVPCI:n = 611)的连续患者。进行Cox比例风险回归分析以补偿两组之间基线特征的差异。为了最小化混杂因素的影响,我们进行了倾向匹配(SVPCI:n = 230,MVPCI:n = 230)。与SVPCI患者相比,MVPCI患者的先前介入治疗或心肌梗塞的发生率较低,并且病变更为复杂。三年后,MVPCI组的全因死亡率显着低于SVPCI组(13.0%比18.3%,p = 0.02,调整后的HR 0.55,95%CI:0.38-0.80),而目标血管的发生率两组之间的血运重建和全因死亡或心肌梗死的复合体无差异。与SVPCI组相比,在倾向匹配的队列中,MVPCI组的全因死亡仍然显着较低(校正后HR 0.41,95%CI:0.22-0.75)。结论:在这项回顾性研究中,与单支血管PCI相比,多支血管PCI可降低NSTEACS引起的全因死亡率。有必要进行进一步的研究以确认这些结果。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号