首页> 外文期刊>EuroIntervention: journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology >Differential relative efficacy between drug-eluting stents in patients with bare metal and drug-eluting stent restenosis; evidence in support of drug resistance: insights from the ISAR-DESIRE and ISAR-DESIRE 2 trials
【24h】

Differential relative efficacy between drug-eluting stents in patients with bare metal and drug-eluting stent restenosis; evidence in support of drug resistance: insights from the ISAR-DESIRE and ISAR-DESIRE 2 trials

机译:裸金属药物洗脱支架与药物洗脱支架再狭窄的相对相对疗效;支持耐药性的证据:ISAR-DESIRE和ISAR-DESIRE 2试验的见解

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Aims: In drug-eluting stent (DES) restenosis, the contribution of drug hyporesponsiveness is poorly defined. We sought to evaluate if, in the setting of treatment for in-stent restenosis, the relative efficacy of sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) and of paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) depends on the underlying substrate in which the stents are implanted, i.e., on whether the restenosis occurs within bare metal stents or within SES. Methods and results: We pooled data from the ISAR-DESIRE and ISAR-DESIRE 2 randomised trials and analysed outcomes in SES-treated and PES-treated patients. In all, 650 patients were included. Angiographic follow-up was available for 87% of patients. In SES-treated patients, both late loss (LL) and percentage diameter stenosis (%DS) were lower in patients treated for bare metal stent restenosis compared with SES restenosis (0.21±0.59 mm versus 0.41±0.66 mm, p=0.007; 27.6±19.4% versus 34.0±20.9%, p=0.015, respectively). In PES-treated patients, LL and %DS were similar in patients treated for bare metal stent restenosis compared with SES restenosis (0.48±0.59 mm versus 0.39±0.71, p=0.47; 33.5±22.2% versus 32.7±18.6%, p=0.75, respectively). Similarly, in terms of overall clinical efficacy, in SES-treated patients clinical outcomes were better in patients with bare metal stent restenosis compared with SES restenosis while in PES-treated patients outcomes were similar in both groups. At multivariate analyses the use of SES to treat restenosis within SES was predictive of both higher LL and %DS. Conclusions: The efficacy of sirolimus-eluting but not paclitaxel-eluting stents is significantly reduced when used for treatment of SES restenosis as compared to bare metal stent restenosis. The lower antiresten-otic efficacy following SES implantation in patients with SES restenosis may support a role for drug resistance in restenosis within these stents.
机译:目的:在药物洗脱支架(DES)再狭窄中,药物反应不足的贡献定义不清。我们试图评估在支架内再狭窄的治疗设置中,西罗莫司洗脱支架(SES)和紫杉醇洗脱支架(PES)的相对疗效是否取决于植入支架的底层基质,即再狭窄是否发生在裸金属支架内或SES内。方法和结果:我们汇总了ISAR-DESIRE和ISAR-DESIRE 2随机试验的数据,并分析了SES治疗和PES治疗患者的结局。总共包括650名患者。 87%的患者可以进行血管造影随访。与SES再狭窄相比,在接受SES治疗的患者中,接受裸金属支架再狭窄的患者的晚期丢失(LL)和直径狭窄百分比(%DS)均较低(0.21±0.59 mm对0.41±0.66 mm,p = 0.007; 27.6 ±19.4%和34.0±20.9%,p = 0.015)。在PES治疗的患者中,与SES再狭窄相比,裸金属支架再狭窄的患者LL和%DS相似(0.48±0.59 mm对0.39±0.71,p = 0.47; 33.5±22.2%对32.7±18.6%,p =分别为0.75)。同样,就整体临床疗效而言,在SES治疗的患者中,裸金属支架再狭窄患者的临床结局优于SES再狭窄,而在PES治疗的患者中,两组的结果相似。在多变量分析中,使用SES治疗SES内的再狭窄可预测LL和%DS均升高。结论:与裸金属支架再狭窄相比,用于治疗SES再狭窄的西罗莫司洗脱支架而非紫杉醇洗脱支架的疗效显着降低。 SES再狭窄患者植入SES后的抗再狭窄功效较低,可能支持这些支架内再狭窄的耐药性作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号