首页> 外文期刊>African Journal of Marine Science >An evaluation of the Marine Living Resources Act and supporting legal instruments as a framework for implementation of an ecosystem approach to fisheries in South Africa
【24h】

An evaluation of the Marine Living Resources Act and supporting legal instruments as a framework for implementation of an ecosystem approach to fisheries in South Africa

机译:对《海洋生物资源法》和辅助性法律文书的评估,将其作为在南非实施生态系统方法实施渔业的框架

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The Marine Living Resources Act (MLRA), which was enacted in 1998, is the primary legislation addressing South Africa's marine fisheries. In June 2012, another important instrument, the Policy for the Small Scale Fisheries Sector (SSFP) in South Africa, was adopted to rectify the exclusion of many small-scale fishers from access to resources, that had resulted from weaknesses in the MLRA. This paper assesses the MLRA, aspects of the SSFP and selected other subsidiary policies and regulations in relation to current best-practices, especially the extent to which they support an ecosystem approach to fisheries (EAF). The study concludes that there are some serious gaps and shortcomings in the MLRA that should be addressed. These include, among others, the need to: (i) revise the MLRA so as to incorporate requirements for open and transparent management and governance; (ii) entrench the principles of co-management, emphasised in the SSFP, for all fisheries; and (iii) include a legal requirement for detailed management plans for all fisheries. Despite these shortcomings, there has been considerable progress in implementation of EAF, at least in the country's bigger fisheries. However, this should not be seen as a justification for avoiding or delaying a revision of the MLRA to bring it into line with modern best-practices as encompassed by EAF.
机译:1998年颁布的《海洋生物资源法》(MLRA)是针对南非海洋渔业的主要立法。 2012年6月,通过了另一项重要文书《南非小规模渔业部门政策》,以纠正由于MLRA薄弱而导致许多小规模渔民无法获得资源的情况。本文评估了MLRA,SSFP的各个方面以及与当前最佳实践相关的其他一些附属政策和法规,尤其是它们在多大程度上支持渔业生态系统方法(EAF)。该研究得出的结论是,MLRA中存在一些严重的缺陷和不足之处,需要解决。除其他外,这些需求包括:(i)修改MLRA,以纳入对公开透明管理和治理的要求; (ii)为所有渔业树立SSFP强调的共同管理原则; (iii)包括对所有渔业的详细管理计划的法律要求。尽管存在这些缺点,但至少在该国较大的渔业中,EAF的实施取得了相当大的进展。但是,这不应被视为避免或延迟对MLRA进行修订以使其与EAF所涵盖的现代最佳实践保持一致的理由。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号