首页> 外文期刊>Europace: European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology >Efficacy of adjunctive ablation of complex fractionated atrial electrograms and pulmonary vein isolation for the treatment of atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
【24h】

Efficacy of adjunctive ablation of complex fractionated atrial electrograms and pulmonary vein isolation for the treatment of atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

机译:复杂分级心房电描记图和肺静脉隔离辅助消融治疗房颤的疗效:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

AIMS: Although useful, percutaneous left atrial ablation for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) does not eliminate atrial fibrillation (AF) in all patients. The ablation of complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAEs) has been proposed as an adjunctive strategy to improve the maintenance of sinus rhythm after PVI. Our objective was to analyse the efficacy of adjunctive CFAE ablation. METHODS AND RESULTS: We meta-analysed six randomized controlled trials (total, n=538) using random-effects modelling to compare PVI (n=291) with PVI plus CFAE ablation (PVI+CFAE) (n=237). The primary outcome was freedom from AF or other atrial tachyarrhythmias (ATs) after a single ablation with or without antiarrhythmic drugs. Following a single ablation, PVI+CFAE improved the odds of freedom from any AF/AT compared with PVI alone (odds ratio 2.0, 95% confidence interval 1.04-3.8, P=0.04) at >/=3-month follow-up. There was moderate heterogeneity among trials (I2=63.0%). Complex fractionated atrial electrogram ablation significantly increased mean procedural (178.5+/-66.9 vs. 331.5+/-92.6 min, P<0.001), mean fluoroscopy (59.5+/-22.2 vs. 115.5+/-35.3 min, P<0.001), and mean radiofrequency (RF) energy application times (46.9+/-36.6 vs. 74.4+/-43.0 min, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Pulmonary vein isolation followed by adjunctive CFAE ablation is associated with increased freedom from AF after a single procedure. Adjunctive CFAE ablation increased procedural, fluoroscopy, and RF application times, and the risk/benefit profile of adjunctive CFAE ablation deserves further evaluation with additional studies and longer-term follow-up.
机译:目的:尽管有用,但经皮左心房消融用于肺静脉隔离(PVI)并不能消除所有患者的心房纤颤(AF)。消融复杂的心房电描记图(CFAEs)已被提议作为一种辅助策略,以改善PVI后维持窦性心律。我们的目标是分析辅助性CFAE消融的疗效。方法和结果:我们使用随机效应模型对6项随机对照试验(总计,n = 538)进行荟萃分析,以比较PVI(n = 291)和PVI加CFAE消融(PVI + CFAE)(n = 237)。主要结局是在单次消融后使用或不使用抗心律失常药物后均无房颤或其他房性快速性心律失常(AT)。单次消融后,在> / = 3个月的随访中,与单独的PVI相比,PVI + CFAE改善了免于AF / AT的自由度(优势比2.0,95%置信区间1.04-3.8,P = 0.04)。试验之间存在中等程度的异质性(I2 = 63.0%)。复杂的分级心电图消融术显着增加了平均手术时间(178.5 +/- 66.9 vs. 331.5 +/- 92.6 min,P <0.001),平均透视检查(59.5 +/- 22.2 vs. 115.5 +/- 35.3 min,P <0.001) ,以及平均射频(RF)能量施加时间(46.9 +/- 36.6分钟与74.4 +/- 43.0分钟,P <0.001)。结论:单次手术后,肺静脉隔离继发CFAE消融与房颤的自由度增加有关。辅助性CFAE消融增加了手术,荧光检查和射频应用时间,并且辅助性CFAE消融的风险/获益概况值得通过其他研究和长期随访进行进一步评估。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号