...
首页> 外文期刊>Epidemiology >Relative excess risk due to interaction: resampling-based confidence intervals.
【24h】

Relative excess risk due to interaction: resampling-based confidence intervals.

机译:由于互动而导致的相对超额风险:基于重采样的置信区间。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Relative excess risk due to interaction (RERI) has been used to quantify the joint effects of 2 exposures in epidemiology. However, the construction of confidence intervals (CIs) for RERI is complicated by sparse cells. Assuming that the data contain no zero cells, here we propose constructing CIs for RERI using nonparametric and parametric bootstrap methods with a continuity correction, and compare these proposed methods to existing methods using 3 empirical examples and Monte Carlo simulations. Our results show that, when cell counts are not sparse, CIs resulting from the explored bootstrap methods are generally acceptable in terms of CI coverage and length, although computationally more demanding than existing methods. However, when cell counts are sparse, the proposed bootstrap methods using a continuity correction outperform existing methods and continue to provide acceptable CIs. The continuity correction is needed for the explored bootstrap methods to provide acceptable CIs because resampled data sets may contain zero cells even when the observed data do not.
机译:因互动而产生的相对超额风险(RERI)已被用于量化流行病学中两次接触的联合影响。但是,稀疏细胞会使RERI的置信区间(CI)的构造变得复杂。假设数据不包含零单元格,我们建议使用具有连续性校正的非参数和参数自举方法构造RERI的CI,并使用3个经验示例和蒙特卡洛模拟将这些方法与现有方法进行比较。我们的结果表明,当细胞计数不稀疏时,尽管在计算上比现有方法要求更高,但是从CI覆盖范围和长度来看,探索的引导程序方法产生的CI通常是可以接受的。但是,当单元数稀疏时,建议的使用连续性校正的自举方法优于现有方法,并继续提供可接受的CI。探索的自举方法需要连续性校正以提供可接受的CI,因为即使在观察到的数据集不包含采样值的情况下,重采样的数据集也可能包含零个像元。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号