首页> 外文期刊>Europace: European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology >Long-term follow-up of DDD and VDD pacing: a prospective non-randomized single-centre comparison of patients with symptomatic atrioventricular block.
【24h】

Long-term follow-up of DDD and VDD pacing: a prospective non-randomized single-centre comparison of patients with symptomatic atrioventricular block.

机译:DDD和VDD起搏的长期随访:有症状房室传导阻滞患者的前瞻性非随机单中心比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This prospective non-randomized single-centre registry compared clinical outcome, pacing parameters, and long-term survival in patients receiving VDD or DDD pacemaker (PMs) for symptomatic atrioventricular (AV) block.Single-lead VDD (n= 166) and DDD (n= 254) PMs were implanted in 420 successive patients with isolated AV block between January 2001 and December 2009. At the end of the follow-up period [median 25 (1-141) months], there was no difference in the incidence of atrial fibrillation [11.2% in the VDD group; 11.4% in the DDD group (P= 0.95)], myocardial infarction [31.1% in the VDD group; 25.2% in the DDD group (P= 0.20)], or dilated cardiomyopathy [9.9% in the VDD group; 8.9% in the DDD group (P= 0.74)]. At last follow-up, 65.9% of the VDD PMs and 89.3% of the DDD PMs were still programmed in their original mode with good atrial sensing. Due to permanent atrial fibrillation, 7.9% patients out of the VDD group had been switched to VVIR mode and 8.7% patients out of the DDD group to VVIR or DDIR mode. The P-wave amplitude was poor (sensed P-wave <0.5 mV) in 19.1% of the VDD PM and 1.6% of the DDD PM (P< 0.001) and 7.1% of the VDD patients and 0.4% of the DDD patients had been switched to VVIR pacing mode due to P-wave undersensing and AV dissociation (P= 0.003). Symptomatic atrial undersensing requiring upgrading was similar in both groups. The overall survival, adjusted for age, was not significantly different in the VDD and the DDD group (log rank: 0.26). Moreover, Cox survival analysis excluded the pacing mode as a significant predictor of mortality [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.79, confidence interval (CI) (0.46-1.35), P= 0.39].Comparing VDD and DDD pacing, a significantly larger number of VDD-paced patients developed poor atrial signal detection without clinical impact. However, atrial under sensing did not influence the incidence of atrial fibrillation, myocardial infarction, dilated cardiomyopathy, or mortality.
机译:该前瞻性非随机单中心注册表比较了有症状房室(AV)阻滞接受VDD或DDD起搏器(PM)的患者的临床结局,起搏参数和长期存活率,单导VDD(n = 166)和DDD (n = 254)在2001年1月至2009年12月之间,将420例PM植入了连续的孤立性房室传导阻滞患者中。在随访期结束时[中位数25(1-141)个月],发生率没有差异心房颤动的发生率[VDD组中为11.2%; DDD组为11.4%(P = 0.95),心肌梗塞[VDD组为31.1%; DDD组为25.2%(P = 0.20)],或扩张型心肌病[VDD组为9.9%; DDD组为8.9%(P = 0.74)]。在最后一次随访中,仍有65.9%的VDD PM和89.3%的DDD PM仍以其原始模式进行了编程,并具有良好的心房感应能力。由于永久性心房颤动,VDD组中的7.9%患者已切换为VVIR模式,而DDD组中的8.7%的患者已切换为VVIR或DDIR模式。在VDD PM的19.1%和DDD PM的1.6%(P <0.001)和VDD患者的7.1%和DDD患者的0.4%的P波振幅较差(感测到的P波<0.5 mV)由于P波欠感和AV离解而被切换到VVIR起搏模式(P = 0.003)。两组的有症状心房感觉不足需要升级。 VDD和DDD组经年龄调整后的总生存率无显着差异(对数秩:0.26)。此外,Cox生存分析排除了起搏模式作为死亡率的重要预测指标[危险比(HR)= 0.79,置信区间(CI)(0.46-1.35),P = 0.39]。比较VDD和DDD起搏VDD起搏的患者心房信号检测不良,无临床影响。但是,感觉不到的心房不影响心房纤颤,心肌梗塞,扩张型心肌病或死亡率的发生率。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号