【24h】

Acute haemodynamic effects of increase in paced heart rate in heart failure patients recorded with an implantable haemodynamic monitor.

机译:用植入式血流动力学监测仪记录的心力衰竭患者心律加快的急性血流动力学效应。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

AIMS: The aim of this study was to investigate the acute effects of different biventricularly paced heart rates (pHRs) on right ventricular (RV) haemodynamics in heart failure (HF) patients with an implantable haemodynamic monitor (IHM). METHODS AND RESULTS: At rest, seven pHRs, range 60-120 bpm (steps of 10), were randomly programmed and maintained for 60 s in 10 patients (male, 65+/-12 years, New York Heart Association II-III). Right ventricular systolic (RVSP) and diastolic pressures, estimated pulmonary artery diastolic (ePAD) pressure, and RV+dP/dt were recorded beat-to-beat using the IHM. Cardiac output (CO) was estimated from the RV pressure waveforms and arterial blood pressure was measured (Portapres(R)). To compare the haemodynamic effects of increased pHR at rest to that of spontaneous, sinus-driven heart rate (HR) increase, patients also performed a symptom-limited bicycle exercise. At rest, RV+dP/dt increased significantly with elevated pHR (P, main effect, <0.001), whereas filling pressures (ePAD and RVSP) decreased significantly in the range 60-100 bpm (P<0.03 and P<0.003, respectively) but tended to increase or level out at pHRs>00 bpm. At a pHR of 100 bpm, ePAD was 1.4 mmHg lower compared with 60 bpm (P<0.01). Cardiac output increased gradually with elevated pHR at rest (P<0.001). Both total peripheral and estimated pulmonary arterial resistance significantly decreased with increased pHR. During exercise-induced maximum HR increase, RV+dP/dt, ePAD, and CO were all significantly higher compared with the corresponding pHR at rest. CONCLUSION: During cardiac resynchronization therapy in HF patients, the force frequency relationship is present in the RV, as increasing the pHR in the range 60-100 bpm results in decreased filling pressures and increased CO.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是通过植入式血流动力学监测仪(IHM)研究不同的双心室起搏心率(pHR)对心力衰竭(HF)患者右心室(RV)血流动力学的急性影响。方法和结果:休息时,随机编程了七个pHR,范围为60-120 bpm(10个步长),并在10例患者(男性,65 +/- 12岁,纽约心脏协会II-III)中维持了60 s 。使用IHM逐次记录右室收缩压(RVSP)和舒张压,估计的肺动脉舒张压(ePAD)和RV + dP / dt。从RV压力波形估计心输出量(CO),并测量动脉血压(Portapres)。为了比较静止时pHR升高与自发的窦性心律升高(HR)的血流动力学影响,患者还进行了症状受限的自行车运动。静止时,RV + dP / dt随着pHR的升高而显着增加(P,主要作用,<0.001),而充盈压(ePAD和RVSP)在60-100 bpm范围内显着降低(分别为P <0.03和P <0.003) ),但在pHRs> 00 bpm时倾向于增加或稳定。在100 bpm的pHR下,ePAD比60 bpm低1.4 mmHg(P <0.01)。静息时pHR升高,心输出量逐渐增加(P <0.001)。总外周和估计的肺动脉阻力均随着pHR的增加而显着降低。在运动引起的最大HR升高期间,与静止时相应的pHR相比,RV + dP / dt,ePAD和CO均显着更高。结论:在HF患者的心脏再同步治疗期间,右心室中存在力频率关系,因为pHR在60-100 bpm范围内增加会导致充盈压降低和CO增加。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号