...
首页> 外文期刊>Epilepsia: Journal of the International League against Epilepsy >The role of brain computed tomography in evaluating children with new onset of seizures in the emergency department.
【24h】

The role of brain computed tomography in evaluating children with new onset of seizures in the emergency department.

机译:脑部计算机断层扫描在急诊科评估新发作的儿童中的作用。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: The purpose of neuroimaging of a patient with new onset of seizures is to demonstrate cause and explore the prognosis. It was recently recommended that emergency brain computed tomography (CT) be performed only in adult seizure patients with an increased likelihood of life-threatening lesions, i.e., those with new focal deficits, persistent altered mental status, fever, recent trauma, persistent headaches, history of cancer, history of anticoagulation, or suspicion of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. The objective of this study was to determine the diagnostic utility of emergency brain CT in children who present to the emergency department with new onset of seizures. METHODS: A 1-year retrospective chart review of all children who presented to the emergency department of the Schneider Children's Hospital with a new onset of seizures and who underwent CT of the brain, excluding children with simple febrile seizures. RESULTS: Sixty-six patients, 34 boys and 32 girls with a mean age of 4.9 years, qualified for inclusion in the study. Fifty-two patients (78.8%) had normal CT results and 14 patients (21.2%) had abnormal CT results. Seizure cause was considered cryptogenic in 33 patients, of whom 2 (6%) had abnormal CT results; neither patient required intervention. Seizure cause was considered symptomatic in 20 patients, of whom 12 (60%) had abnormal CT results (p < 0.0001). In two patients with abnormal CT scans (both acute symptomatic), the imaging findings were of immediate therapeutic significance and were predictable from the clinical history and the physical examination. None of the 13 patients with complex febrile seizure cause had an abnormal CT scan. Patients with partial convulsive seizures were more likely to have abnormal CT scans than patients with generalized convulsive seizures, but the difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The routine practice in many pediatric emergency departments of obtaining brain CT scans for all patients with new onset of nonfebrile seizures is unjustified. History and physical examination are sufficient to identify those patients for whom such studies are likely to be appropriate. Emergent CT is not indicated for patients with no known seizure risk factors, normal neurological examinations, no acute symptomatic cause other than fever, and reliable neurological follow-up. For these patients, referral to a pediatric neurologist for further workup, including electroencephalography and the more diagnostically valuable magnetic resonance imaging, would be more appropriate.
机译:背景:对新发作的患者进行神经影像学检查的目的是证明原因并探讨其预后。最近建议,仅对有威胁生命危险的成年癫痫患者(即患有新的局灶缺陷,精神状态持续改变,发烧,近期创伤,持续头痛的患者)进行紧急脑计算机断层扫描(CT),癌症史,抗凝史或怀疑获得性免疫缺陷综合症。这项研究的目的是确定急诊脑CT对出现新发作的急诊科儿童的诊断作用。方法:为期1年的回顾性图表回顾,回顾了所有出现在施耐德儿童医院急诊科的新发癫痫发作并接受了脑部CT检查的儿童,但单纯性高热惊厥儿童除外。结果:66名患者,平均年龄为4.9岁的34名男孩和32名女孩,符合纳入研究的条件。 52例(78.8%)的CT结果正常,14例(21.2%)的CT结果异常。 33例患者被认为是癫痫发作的原因,其中2例(6%)的CT结果异常;没有患者需要干预。 20例患者被认为是有症状的癫痫发作原因,其中12例(60%)的CT检查结果异常(p <0.0001)。在两名CT扫描异常(均为急性症状)的患者中,影像学检查具有直接的治疗意义,并且可以从临床病史和体格检查中预测到。 13例伴有高热惊厥的患者中,没有一例CT扫描异常。局部抽搐发作的患者比全身性抽搐发作的患者更有可能出现CT扫描异常,但差异无统计学意义。结论:许多儿科急诊科的常规做法是对所有非热性惊厥发作的所有患者进行脑部CT扫描。病史和体格检查足以确定可能适合进行此类研究的那些患者。没有已知癫痫发作危险因素,神经系统检查正常,发烧以外没有其他急性症状,以及可靠的神经系统随访的患者,不建议使用紧急CT。对于这些患者,更适合转诊至儿科神经科医生进行进一步检查,包括脑电图检查和更具诊断价值的磁共振成像。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号