首页> 外文期刊>Ethology >Patch Use in Free-Ranging Goats: Does a Large Mammalian Herbivore Forage like Other Central Place Foragers?
【24h】

Patch Use in Free-Ranging Goats: Does a Large Mammalian Herbivore Forage like Other Central Place Foragers?

机译:散养山羊的斑块使用:大型哺乳动物食草动物是否像其他中部觅食者一样觅食?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Classic central place foraging theory does not focus on the foraging of central place herbivores. This is especially true with regard to large mammalian herbivores. To understand the foraging dynamics of these neglected foragers, we measured giving-up densities (GUDs) in artificial food patches. We did this at different distances away from the central point (i.e. corral) for a herd of free-ranging domestic goats. To determine temporal changes, we conducted the study over a 3-mo period during an extended dry season. Throughout our study, goats foraged across a gradient of food availability where forage was more available farther away from the central point. In contrast to the prediction that predation risk and/or increased travel costs were the main drivers of foraging decisions, we found that the goats increased their feeding effort (i.e. achieved lower GUDs) the farther away they moved from the central point. This suggests that either metabolic or missed opportunity costs were the main factors that influenced foraging decisions. In addition, we suggest that social foraging may have also played a role. With increases in foraging opportunities away from the central point, a herd will likely move slowly while foraging. As a result, individuals can feed intensively from patches but remain part of the group. Ironically, owing to the sustained close proximity of other group members, individuals may perceive patches farther from the central point as being safer. Temporally, the goats increased their feeding effort throughout the dry season. This suggests there was a decline in food quality and/or availability across the environment as the study progressed. Despite this increase in feeding effort, the negative relationship with distance did not change. Ultimately, our results provide key insight into how metabolic, missed opportunity and perceived predation costs influence the feeding decisions of large central place herbivores.
机译:经典的中心地带觅食理论并不关注中心地带草食动物的觅食。对于大型哺乳动物食草动物尤其如此。为了了解这些被忽视的觅食者的觅食动态,我们测量了人工食物补丁中的放弃密度(GUD)。对于一群自由放养的家养山羊,我们在距中心点(即畜栏)不同距离处进行了此操作。为了确定时间变化,我们在延长的干旱季节进行了为期3个月的研究。在我们的整个研究过程中,山羊在不同的食物可供量范围内觅食,而在远离中心点的地方,牧草更容易获取。与捕食风险和/或旅行成本增加是觅食决定的主要驱动力这一预测相反,我们发现山羊离中心位置越远,它们的饲养力就越强(即获得的GUD值越低)。这表明代谢或错过的机会成本是影响觅食决策的主要因素。此外,我们建议社交觅食也可能起到了作用。随着觅食机会远离中心点,牧群在觅食时可能会缓慢移动。结果,个体可以从斑块密集地觅食,但仍是该群体的一部分。具有讽刺意味的是,由于其他小组成员之间的持续紧密联系,个人可能会认为离中心点较远的补丁更为安全。在整个干旱季节,山羊暂时会增加进食量。这表明随着研究的进展,整个环境的食品质量和/或供应量均下降。尽管进食量有所增加,但与距离的负相关关系并未改变。最终,我们的结果提供了关于新陈代谢,错过的机会以及感知到的捕食成本如何影响大型中心食草动物喂养决策的关键见解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号