首页> 外文期刊>Brachytherapy >One-step customized transurethral resection of the prostate and permanent implant brachytherapy for selected prostate cancer patients: Technically feasible but too toxic
【24h】

One-step customized transurethral resection of the prostate and permanent implant brachytherapy for selected prostate cancer patients: Technically feasible but too toxic

机译:一步定制的经尿道前列腺前列腺切除术和永久性植入物近距离放射疗法,适用于部分前列腺癌患者:技术上可行,但毒性太大

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Patients with prominent median lobe hyperplasia and/or high International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) are often contraindicated for prostate brachytherapy, mainly because of the risk of post-implant urinary retention. We evaluated an approach combining in the same operative step a limited transurethral resection (TURP) of the median lobe, immediately followed by permanent implant-free seed brachytherapy. Methods and Materials: From January 2007 to November 2008, 22 patients underwent a customized limited TURP of their median lobe immediately before brachytherapy. All patients fulfilled our criteria for permanent implant brachytherapy, but presented with a more or less prominent median lobe and/or a high IPSS. Results: The procedure appeared to be technically feasible, with only 0.3% of migrating seeds, a mean post-implant D90 of 173.4 Gy and a mean post-implant V100 of 96.6%. However, 5 patients (23%) experienced a urinary retention, with two patients having to undergo a complementary post-implant TURP. Moreover, urinary toxicity was more pronounced than in our current experience, with high IPSS at 2 months (mean 19.2) and 6 months (mean 15.8). Conclusion: Although technically feasible, with relatively few migrating seeds and satisfactory post-implant dosimetric parameters, one-step TURP and brachytherapy was found to be poorly tolerated, with higher than usual urinary retention and urinary toxicity rates. Considering those results, our group is presently evaluating a two-step procedure, with a customized TURP followed after 4-6 months by brachytherapy.
机译:具有明显中位叶增生和/或国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)高的患者通常被禁止进行前列腺近距离放射治疗,主要是因为植入后的尿retention留风险。我们评估了在同一手术步骤中结合正中叶有限的经尿道切除术(TURP)的方法,然后立即进行永久性无植入种子近距离放射治疗。方法和材料:自2007年1月至2008年11月,在近距离放疗前即刻对22例患者的中叶进行了定制的有限TURP。所有患者均符合我们永久性植入物近距离放射治疗的标准,但均呈现或多或少突出的中叶和/或高IPSS。结果:该程序在技术上看来是可行的,只有0.3%的迁移种子,平均植入后D90为173.4 Gy,平均植入后V100为96.6%。但是,有5名患者(23%)出现尿retention留,其中两名患者必须接受补充的植入后TURP。此外,尿毒症的毒性比我们目前的经验更为明显,在两个月(平均19.2)和六个月(平均15.8)时IPSS高。结论:尽管在技术上可行,并且种子迁移相对较少,并且植入后的剂量参数令人满意,但单步TURP和近距离放疗的耐受性差,尿液滞留率和尿毒率高于平常。考虑到这些结果,我们的小组目前正在评估两步程序,使用定制的TURP,然后在4-6个月后进行近距离放射治疗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号