...
首页> 外文期刊>Epilepsy & behavior: E&B >Is antiepileptic drug withdrawal status related to quality of life in seizure-free adult patients with epilepsy?
【24h】

Is antiepileptic drug withdrawal status related to quality of life in seizure-free adult patients with epilepsy?

机译:无癫痫发作的成年癫痫患者的抗癫痫药停药状态是否与生活质量相关?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: This study aimed to determine factors that influence the quality of life (QOL) of seizure-free adult patients with epilepsy in western China and address whether these determinants vary by antiepileptic drug (AED) withdrawal. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in the epilepsy outpatient clinic of West China Hospital, Sichuan University. Patients with epilepsy who were aged at least 18. years and seizure-free for at least 12. months were interviewed using the Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory-31 (QOLIE-31); the National Hospital Seizure Severity Scale (NHS3); the Liverpool Adverse Events Profile (LAEP); the Social Support Rating Scale (SSRS); the Family Adaptation, Partnership, Growth, Affection, and Resolve (APGAR) Questionnaire; and the Scale of Knowledge and Attitudes Toward Epilepsy. Eligible patients were divided into two groups: the nonwithdrawal group and the withdrawal group. The independent-samples t-test was used to compare the QOL between the groups, and linear regression analysis was used to explain the variance of their QOL. Results: One hundred and eighty-seven (135 nonwithdrawal and 52 withdrawal) patients were included in the analysis. The QOLIE-31 overall score of the nonwithdrawal group was lower than that of the withdrawal group (p<. 0.01). The LAEP score was the strongest predictor of the QOLIE-31 overall score of all subjects, explaining 26.9% of the variance. The second strongest predictor was the SSRS score, explaining 12.9%, and the other predictors were the NHS3 score (5.2%), education level (2.3%), age (1.5%), and marriage (1.0%). Furthermore, the strongest predictors in the nonwithdrawal group were the LAEP and SSRS scores, while in the withdrawal group, the strongest predictors were stigma scores and employment. Conclusion: Among the seizure-free adult patients with epilepsy, those with AED withdrawal experienced better QOL than those continuing AED treatment. Furthermore, the determinants of QOL varied by AED withdrawal. Individual strategies to optimize QOL should be developed based on these differences.
机译:目的:本研究旨在确定影响中国西部无癫痫发作的成人患者生活质量(QOL)的因素,并探讨这些决定因素是否因抗癫痫药(AED)退出而有所不同。方法:在四川大学华西医院癫痫门诊进行横断面研究。癫痫患者年龄在18岁以上且无癫痫发作至少12个月的患者接受了《癫痫病患者生活质量调查表-31》(QOLIE-31)的访谈。国家医院癫痫发作严重程度量表(NHS3);利物浦不良事件概况(LAEP);社会支持评级量表(SSRS);家庭适应,伙伴关系,成长,情感和决心(APGAR)问卷;以及对癫痫病的知识和态度量表。符合条件的患者分为两组:不撤药组和撤药组。使用独立样本t检验比较两组之间的QOL,并使用线性回归分析解释其QOL的方差。结果:一百八十七名患者(135名未退出,52名退出)被纳入分析。非戒断组的QOLIE-31总分低于戒断组(p <.0.01)。 LAEP得分是所有受试者QOLIE-31总得分的最强预测因子,解释了26.9%的方差。第二强的预测指标是SSRS得分,解释率为12.9%,其他预测因子为NHS3得分(5.2%),受教育程度(2.3%),年龄(1.5%)和婚姻(1.0%)。此外,非退出组中最强的预测指标是LAEP和SSRS得分,而退出组中,最强的预测指标是耻辱得分和就业。结论:在无癫痫发作的成年癫痫患者中,AED停药者的QOL优于持续AED治疗者。此外,QOL的决定因素因AED退出而异。应根据这些差异制定优化QOL的个别策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号