首页> 外文期刊>Ethnicity & health >Racism, ethnic density and psychological well-being through adolescence: Evidence from the Determinants of Adolescent Social well-being and Health longitudinal study
【24h】

Racism, ethnic density and psychological well-being through adolescence: Evidence from the Determinants of Adolescent Social well-being and Health longitudinal study

机译:种族主义,种族密度和青春期的心理健康:来自青少年的决定因素的证据社会幸福和健康状况纵向研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective. To investigate the effect of racism, own-group ethnic density, diversity and deprivation on adolescent trajectories in psychological well-being. Design. Multilevel models were used in longitudinal analysis of psychological well-being (total difficulties score (TDS) from Goodman's Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire, higher scores correspond to greater difficulties) for 4782 adolescents aged 11-16 years in 51 London (UK) schools. Individual level variables included ethnicity, racism, gender, age, migrant generation, socio-economic circumstances, family type and indicators of family interactions (shared activities, perceived parenting). Contextual variables were per cent eligible for free school-meals, neighbourhood deprivation, per cent own-group ethnic density, and ethnic diversity. Results. Ethnic minorities were more likely to report racism than Whites. Ethnic minority boys (except Indian boys) and Indian girls reported better psychological well-being throughout adolescence compared to their White peers. Notably, lowest mean TDS scores were observed for Nigerian/Ghanaian boys, among whom the reporting of racism increased with age. Adjusted for individual characteristics, psychological well-being improved with age across all ethnic groups. Racism was associated with poorer psychological well-being trajectories for all ethnic groups (p<0.001), reducing with age. For example, mean difference in TDS (95% confidence interval) between boys who experienced racism and those who did not at age 12 years=1.88 (+1.75 to+2.01); at 16 years=+1.19 (+1.07 to+1.31). Less racism was generally reported in schools and neighbourhoods with high than low own-group density. Own ethnic density and diversity were not consistently associated with TDS for any ethnic group. Living in more deprived neighbourhoods was associated with poorer psychological well-being for Whites and Black Caribbeans (p<0.05). Conclusion. Racism, but not ethnic density and deprivation in schools or neighbourhoods, was an important influence on psychological well-being. However, exposure to racism did not explain the advantage in psychological well-being of ethnic minority groups over Whites.
机译:目的。调查种族主义,自己的族裔密度,多样性和剥夺对青少年的心理健康轨迹的影响。设计。在英国伦敦51所学校的4782名11-16岁青少年中,使用多层次模型对心理健康进行纵向分析(来自Goodman的《强项和困难》问卷的总困难评分(TDS),分数越高表示困难越大)。个人层面的变量包括种族,种族,性别,年龄,移民人口,社会经济状况,家庭类型和家庭互动的指标(共同活动,知觉育儿)。上下文变量符合免费学校餐,邻里剥夺,本族种族密度和种族多样性的百分比。结果。少数民族比白人更有可能报告种族主义。与白人同龄人相比,少数民族男孩(印度男孩除外)和印度女孩在整个青春期的心理健康状况均得到改善。值得注意的是,尼日利亚/加纳男孩的平均TDS得分最低,其中种族主义的报道随着年龄的增长而增加。根据个人特征进行调整后,各族裔的心理健康都会随着年龄的增长而提高。种族主义与所有族裔的较差的心理健康轨迹相关(p <0.001),并且随着年龄的增长而降低。例如,经历过种族歧视的男孩与未经历过12岁的男孩之间的TDS(95%置信区间)平均差异为1.88(+1.75至+2.01); 16岁= + 1.19(+1.07至+1.31)。据报道,在学校和社区中,种族歧视较少,而群体密度较低。对于任何种族,自己的种族密度和多样性都与TDS不一致。在白人和黑加勒比海地区,生活在较贫困地区的人的心理健康状况较差(p <0.05)。结论。种族主义,而不是种族密度和学校或社区的贫困,对心理健康具有重要影响。但是,暴露于种族主义并不能说明少数民族在心理健康方面比白人优越。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号