...
首页> 外文期刊>Epilepsia: Journal of the International League against Epilepsy >Role of ictal baseline shifts and ictal high-frequency oscillations in stereo-electroencephalography analysis of mesial temporal lobe seizures
【24h】

Role of ictal baseline shifts and ictal high-frequency oscillations in stereo-electroencephalography analysis of mesial temporal lobe seizures

机译:小波基线漂移和小波高频振荡在颞叶癫痫发作的立体脑电图分析中的作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Objective To assess the role of ictal baseline shifts (IBS) and ictal high-frequency oscillations (iHFOs) in intracranial electroencephalography (EEG) presurgical evaluation by analysis of the spatial and temporal relationship of IBS, iHFOs with ictal conventional stereo-electroencephalography (icEEG) in mesial temporal lobe seizures (MTLS). Methods We studied 15 adult patients with medically refractory MTLS who underwent monitoring with depth electrodes. Seventy-five ictal EEG recordings at 1,000 Hz sampling rate were studied. Visual comparison of icEEG, IBS, and iHFOs were performed using Nihon-Kohden Neurofax systems (acquisition range 0.016-300 Hz). Each recorded ictal EEG was analyzed with settings appropriate for displaying icEEG, IBS, and iHFOs. Results IBS and iHFOs were observed in all patients and in 91% and 81% of intracranial seizures, respectively. IBS occurred before (22%), at (57%), or after (21%) icEEG onset. In contrast, iHFOs occurred at (30%) or after (70%) icEEG onset. The onset of iHFOs was 11.5 s later than IBS onset (p < 0.0001). All of the earliest onset of IBS and 70% of the onset of iHFOs overlapped with the ictal onset zone (IOZ). Compared with iHFOs, interictal HFOs (itHFOs) were less correlated with IOZ. In contrast to icEEG, IBS and iHFOs had smaller spatial distributions in 70% and 100% of the seizures, respectively. An IBS dipole was observed in 66% of the seizures. Eighty-seven percent of the dipoles had a negative pole at the anterior/medial part of amygdala/hippocampus complex (A-H complex) and a positive pole at the posterior/lateral part of the A-H complex. Significance The results suggest that evaluation of IBS and iHFOs, in addition to routine icEEG, helps in more accurately defining the IOZ. This study also shows that the onset and the spatial distribution of icEEG, IBS, and iHFOs do not overlap, suggesting that they reflect different cellular or network dynamics.
机译:目的通过分析IBS,iHFOs与短暂性常规立体脑电图(icEEG)的时空关系,评估短暂性基线变化(IBS)和高频高频振荡(iHFOs)在颅内脑电图(EEG)术前评估中的作用在颞叶颞叶癫痫发作(MTLS)中。方法我们研究了15例接受深度电极监测的成人难治性MTLS患者。研究了以1,000 Hz采样率的75头EEG记录。使用Nihon-Kohden Neurofax系统(采集范围0.016-300 Hz)对icEEG,IBS和iHFO进行视觉比较。使用适合于显示icEEG,IBS和iHFO的设置来分析每个记录的ictal EEG。结果所有患者以及颅内癫痫发作均观察到IBS和iHFOs,分别为91%和81%。 IBS发生在icEEG发作之前(22%),发生在(57%)或之后(21%)。相反,iHFO在icEEG发作时(30%)或之后(70%)发生。 iHFO的发作比IBS的发作晚11.5 s(p <0.0001)。 IBS的所有最早发作和iHFO的发作的70%与发作期发作区(IOZ)重叠。与iHFO相比,间质性HFO(itHFO)与IOZ的相关性较小。与icEEG相比,IBS和iHFO在70%和100%的癫痫发作中具有较小的空间分布。在66%的癫痫发作中观察到IBS偶极子。百分之八十七的偶极在杏仁核/海马复合体(A-H复合体)的前/中部具有负极,而在A-H复合体的后/外侧部具有正极。重要性结果表明,除常规icEEG外,对IBS和iHFO的评估还有助于更准确地定义IOZ。这项研究还表明,icEEG,IBS和iHFO的发作和空间分布不重叠,这表明它们反映了不同的细胞或网络动力学。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号