...
首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts >Quantitative passive soil vapor sampling for VOCs- part 2: laboratory experiments
【24h】

Quantitative passive soil vapor sampling for VOCs- part 2: laboratory experiments

机译:用于挥发性有机化合物的定量被动土壤蒸气取样-第2部分:实验室实验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Controlled laboratory experiments were conducted to demonstrate the use of passive samplers for soil vapor concentration monitoring. Five different passive samplers were studied (Radiello, SKC Ultra, Waterloo Membrane Sampler, ATD tubes and 3M OVM 3500). Ten different volatile organic compounds were used of varying classes (chlorinated ethanes, ethanes, and methanes, aliphatics and aromatics) and physical properties (vapor pressure, solubility and sorption). Samplers were exposed in randomized triplicates to concentrations of 1, 10 and 100 ppm_v, with a relative humidity of ~80%, a temperature of ~24 °C, and a duration of 30 minutes in a chamber with a face velocity of about 5 cm min~(-1) Passive samplers are more commonly used for longer sample durations (e.g., 8 hour workday) and higher face velocities (>600 cm min~(-1)), so testing to verify the performance for these conditions was needed. Summa canister samples were collected and analyzed by EPA Method TO-15 to establish a baseline for comparison for all the passive samplers. Low-uptake rate varieties of four of the samplers were also tested at 10 ppm_v under two conditions; with 5 cm min~(-1) face velocity and stagnant conditions to assess whether low or near-zero face velocities would result in a low bias from the starvation effect. The results indicate that passive samplers can provide concentration measurements with accuracy (mostly within a factor of 2) and precision (RSD < 15%) comparable to conventional Summa canister samples and EPA Method TO-15 analysis. Some compounds are challenging for some passive samplers because of uncertainties in the uptake rates, or challenges with retention or recovery.
机译:进行了受控的实验室实验,以证明使用被动采样器进行土壤蒸汽浓度监测。研究了五个不同的无源采样器(Radiello,SKC Ultra,滑铁卢膜采样器,ATD管和3M OVM 3500)。使用了十种不同的挥发性有机化合物,这些化合物具有不同的类别(氯化乙烷,乙烷和甲烷,脂族和芳族化合物)和物理特性(蒸气压,溶解度和吸附力)。采样器以一式三份的方式分别暴露于1、10和100 ppm_v的浓度,相对湿度为〜80%,温度为〜24°C,在腔室内的持续时间为30分钟,表面速度约为5 cm min〜(-1)无源采样器通常用于更长的采样时间(例如8小时工作日)和更高的面部速度(> 600 cm min〜(-1)),因此需要进行测试以验证这些条件下的性能。收集总罐样品并通过EPA TO-15方法进行分析,以建立用于比较所有被动采样器的基准。还在两个条件下以10 ppm_v测试了四个采样器的低摄取率品种。以5 cm min〜(-1)的面速度和停滞条件评估低或接近零的面速度是否会导致饥饿效应产生较低的偏差。结果表明,与传统的Summa罐样品和EPA Method TO-15分析相比,无源采样器可以提供浓度测量(大多数在2倍以内)和精度(RSD <15%)。由于吸收速率的不确定性或保留或回收方面的挑战,某些化合物对某些被动采样器具有挑战性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号