首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Entomology >Ant assemblage on a coffee farm: spatial mosaic versus shifting patchwork.
【24h】

Ant assemblage on a coffee farm: spatial mosaic versus shifting patchwork.

机译:一家咖啡农场的蚂蚁组合:空间拼接与错落有致的拼布。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Competition has been recognized as a major organizing process in ant communities, with ant communities frequently forming spatial mosaics of dominant species associated with subdominants. Often, species exhibit tradeoffs in their ability to discover versus dominate resources, suggesting a mechanism for coexistence. Here we describe spatial patterns of dominant ants in two sites within a coffee plantation. Ants were sampled for three consecutive years by using tuna baits set on a grid on the ground and on coffee bushes. In addition, so as to determine which species discovered baits first and which species dominated baits, a separate experiment was set up where baits were observed every minute for 2 hr. The relative abundance of species followed a power law, with coefficients of determination ranging from 92 to 97% explanation. At site I the terrestrial community is dominated by two species, Pheidole synanthropica Longino and Pheidole protensa Wilson, whereas at site II the community exhibits codominance of four species: P. synanthropica, P. protensa, Solenopsis geminata F., and Pheidole 1 group. The spatial pattern formed by these species is distinct for each of the sites, both in terms of generalized appearance and dynamic stability. The terrestrial foraging ants at site I do not maintain a fixed mosaic over time. In contrast, at site II ants maintain a fixed mosaic. The arboreally foraging ants reflect, to some extent, the pattern of the terrestrial foragers. A possible interpretation of these results is that dominant ants at site I contain competitive intransitivities that generate a changing mosaic, whereas dominant ants in site II are organized in a competitive hierarchy that generates a fixed mosaic.
机译:竞争已被认为是蚂蚁群落的主要组织过程,蚂蚁群落经常形成与次优势相关的优势物种的空间镶嵌。通常,物种在发现和控制资源的能力上会权衡取舍,这表明存在共存的机制。在这里,我们描述了咖啡种植园中两个地点的优势蚂蚁的空间格局。通过使用金枪鱼饵料连续三年对蚂蚁进行采样,这些金枪鱼饵料放置在地面上的网格和咖啡灌木上。另外,为了确定哪些物种首先发现了诱饵,哪些物种主导了诱饵,建立了单独的实验,每分钟观察诱饵2小时。物种的相对丰度遵循幂律,确定系数的解释范围为92%至97%。在站点I,陆地群落由两个物种控制,即:Pheidole synanthropica Longino和Pheidole protensa Wilson,而在站点II,该群落表现出四种物种的共存性:P。synanthropica,P。protensa,Soleenopsis geminata F.和Pheidole 1组。在总体外观和动态稳定性方面,这些物种形成的空间格局对于每个地点都是不同的。随着时间的推移,站点I上的地面觅食蚂蚁没有保持固定的镶嵌。相反,在站点II处,蚂蚁保持固定的镶嵌。树木觅食的蚂蚁在某种程度上反映了陆地觅食的模式。这些结果的一种可能解释是,站点I上的优势蚂蚁包含竞争性不透明性,从而产生变化的镶嵌图,而站点II中的优势蚂蚁按竞争性层次结构组织,从而生成固定的镶嵌图。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号