首页> 外文期刊>Equine Veterinary Education >Original Article: The outcome of vaccinating five pregnant mares with a commercial equine viral arteritis vaccine
【24h】

Original Article: The outcome of vaccinating five pregnant mares with a commercial equine viral arteritis vaccine

机译:原始文章:用商业马病毒性动脉炎疫苗为五只怀孕母马接种疫苗的结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Integral to current programmes for the prevention and control of equine viral arteritis (EVA) in North America is the availability of a safe and effective vaccine against the disease. This is a modified live virus (MLV) vaccine (Arvac)1, which has been in commercial use since 1985 (Timoney and McCollum 1993). It was derived from an experimental vaccine against EVA that was developed earlier (Doll ef al. 1968). In safety and efficacy studies of their vaccine, Doll ef al. (1968) demonstrated that equine arteritis virus (EAV) serially passaged 131x in primary horse kidney followed by 32x in primary rabbit kidney (HK131-RK32) was not fully attenuated for pregnant mares in that it induced abortion in 2 mares in the 8th to 9th month of gestation when inoculated directly into the fetus or into the amniotic sac. Furthermore, they isolated virus from the lungs and spleen of a foal killed within a few hours of birth whose dam had been vaccinated 12 days earlier with virus of higher passage history in cell culture (HK131-RK80). Subsequently, McCollum (1970) demonstrated that a modified strain of EAV of still higher passage history (HK131-RK111) was safe when tested in pregnant pony mares. Neither abortion nor any other adverse effect was observed in 18 maresinoculated by the intramuscular route when 30 days pregnant to near term. Although the current MLV vaccine against EVA has a significantly higher passage history in cell culture (HK131-RK111-Eq dermis 24) than the earlier vaccines evaluated by Doll et al. (1968) and McCollum (1969, 1970, 1986), the vaccine manufacturers considered it prudent not to recommend its use in pregnant mares, especially in the last 2 months of gestation, unless in situations of high risk of natural exposure to the virus. Notwithstanding this label restriction, the vaccine, in fact, was used to vaccinate pregnant mares on the occasion of several major occurrences of EVA over the past 20 years. Use of the vaccine under such circumstances did not apparently result in outbreaks of vaccine-induced abortion or illness and death in neonatal foals. However, there is one report implicating the MLV vaccine strain as the cause of an isolated case of equine abortion (Moore et al. 2003). The dam, a recently vaccinated mare, aborted in the course of an extensive outbreak of EVA on a Thoroughbred breeding farm in Illinois in 1994. Viral identification was based on the nucleotide sequence homology of open reading frame 5 of the isolate and that of the vaccine strain of EAV.
机译:安全,有效的针对该疾病的疫苗是北美目前预防和控制马病毒性动脉炎(EVA)计划的重要组成部分。这是一种改良的活病毒(MLV)疫苗(Arvac)1,自1985年以来已投入商业使用(Timoney和McCollum 1993)。它源自较早开发的针对EVA的实验疫苗(Doll等,1968)。在对其疫苗的安全性和有效性研究中,Doll等人。 (1968)证明,马母动脉炎病毒(EAV)在原代马肾中连续传代131x,然后在原代兔肾中传播32x(HK131-RK32)对于怀孕的母马并没有完全减弱,因为它会在8至9日在2只母马中引起流产。直接接种到胎儿或羊膜囊中的妊娠一个月。此外,他们从出生后数小时内被杀死的小马驹的肺和脾脏中分离出病毒,该大坝已在12天前用细胞培养中具有较高传代史的病毒进行了疫苗接种(HK131-RK80)。随后,McCollum(1970)证明,在怀孕的小马母马中测试时,具有更高传代史的改良型EAV株(HK131-RK111)是安全的。怀孕30天至近期期间,在通过肌肉注射途径接种的18只马瑞斯疫苗中,未观察到流产或其他任何不良反应。尽管目前针对EVA的MLV疫苗在细胞培养中的传代历史(HK131-RK111-Eq真皮24)比Doll等人评估的较早疫苗显着更高。 (1968)和McCollum(1969,1970,1986),疫苗生产商认为,不建议在怀孕的母马中使用它,尤其是在妊娠的最后两个月,除非在自然暴露于该病毒的高风险情况下,否则最好不要使用它。尽管有这种标签限制,但实际上在过去20年中,在EVA发生几次重大事件的情况下,该疫苗实际上已用于给怀孕的母马接种疫苗。在这种情况下使用疫苗显然不会导致疫苗引起的流产或新生儿小马驹死亡甚至死亡。然而,有报道称MLV疫苗株是马堕胎的单独病例的原因(Moore et al。2003)。该大坝是最近接种过的母马,在1994年伊利诺伊州一个纯种繁殖场的EVA广泛暴发的过程中被中止。病毒的鉴定是基于该分离株与疫苗的开放阅读框5的核苷酸序列同源性。 EAV株。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号