...
首页> 外文期刊>Brachytherapy >Transperineal injection of hyaluronic acid in the anterior perirectal fat to decrease rectal toxicity from radiation delivered with low-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer patients.
【24h】

Transperineal injection of hyaluronic acid in the anterior perirectal fat to decrease rectal toxicity from radiation delivered with low-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer patients.

机译:经直肠会阴前透明脂肪注射透明质酸可降低前列腺癌患者低剂量率近距离放射治疗所产生的放射线对直肠的毒性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

PURPOSE: Monitored rectal late morbidity using proctoscopy and a modified radiation therapy oncology group rectal bleeding scoring scale, in patients treated with permanent implant of I-125 and submitted to rectal protection with hyaluronic acid (HA) injecting in the perirectal fat to increase the distance between the prostate and the anterior rectal wall to decrease rectal toxicity. This is the first article looking at such injections in low-dose-rate brachytherapy patients and subsequent rectal toxicity. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between January 2005 and July 2006, a total of 69 consecutive outpatients with low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer were enrolled in a clinical trial. First group received brachytherapy alone with I-125 and the second group received brachytherapy I-125 and protection of the rectal wall with HA. We injected 6-8cc of HA in the perirectal fat, to increase the distance between the prostate and the anterior rectal wall. Proctoscopic examinations with scoring of mucosal damage were performed according to a descriptive scale, described by Wachter et al. The median follow-up at time of endoscopy was 18 months. Toxicity measures included modified radiation therapy oncology group late bleeding toxicity grading. RESULTS: The hyaluronic and non-hyaluronic groups were similar for most patients, in tumor, treatment, and dosimetric characteristics. Patients treated with brachytherapy I-125 and rectal protection with HA had significantly smaller incidence of mucosal damage at the proctoscopic examinations (5% vs. 36%, p=0.002) and no macroscopic rectal bleeding (0% vs. 12%, p=0.047) than those treated with brachytherapy I-125 alone without HA. No toxicity was produced from the HA or its injection. CONCLUSIONS: The increased distance between the rectal wall and the prostate, as a result from the injection of HA in the perirectal fat, has significantly decreased the rectal dose from low-dose-rate brachytherapy. Patients treated with brachytherapy I-125 and protection rectal with HA had significantly smaller incidence of mucosal damage at the proctoscopic examinations and no macroscopic rectal bleeding than those treated with brachytherapy I-125 alone without HA.
机译:目的:使用直肠镜和改良放射治疗肿瘤学组直肠出血评分量表监测直肠晚期发病率,对接受I-125永久植入治疗并接受透明质酸(HA)注射并在直肠周围脂肪中进行直肠保护以增加距离的患者在前列腺和直肠前壁之间降低直肠毒性。这是第一篇针对低剂量率近距离放射治疗患者的这种注射以及随后的直肠毒性的文章。方法和材料:自2005年1月至2006年7月,共有69位低危和中危前列腺癌的门诊患者参加了一项临床试验。第一组接受I-125单独进行近距离放射治疗,第二组接受I-125进行近距离放射治疗并用HA保护直肠壁。我们在直肠周围的脂肪中注入了6-8cc的HA,以增加前列腺与直肠前壁之间的距离。根据描述性的量表进行了具有粘膜损伤评分的直肠镜检查,如Wachter等所述。内镜检查的中位随访时间为18个月。毒性措施包括改良放射治疗肿瘤学组晚期出血毒性分级。结果:大多数患者的透明质酸和非透明质酸组在肿瘤,治疗和剂量学特征方面相似。用I-125近距离放射疗法和HA进行直肠保护的患者在镜检时粘膜损伤的发生率显着较小(5%对36%,p = 0.002),无肉眼可见的直肠出血(0%对12%,p = 0.047)的患者比单纯接受HA的近距离放射疗法I-125治疗的患者要高。 HA或其注射液未产生毒性。结论:由于在直肠周围脂肪中注射HA,直肠壁与前列腺之间的距离增加,已显着降低了低剂量率近距离放射治疗的直肠剂量。与仅接受HA的近距离放射治疗I-125相比,接受I-125的近距离放射治疗和HA保护性直肠治疗的患者在镜检时粘膜损害发生率明显降低,并且没有宏观的直肠出血。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号