首页> 外文期刊>Environmental and molecular mutagenesis. >In vivo rodent erythrocyte micronucleus assay. II. Some aspects of protocol design including repeated treatments, integration with toxicity testing, and automated scoring.
【24h】

In vivo rodent erythrocyte micronucleus assay. II. Some aspects of protocol design including repeated treatments, integration with toxicity testing, and automated scoring.

机译:体内啮齿动物红细胞微核测定。二。协议设计的某些方面,包括重复治疗,与毒性测试的集成以及自动评分。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

An expert working group on the in vivo micronucleus assay, formed as part of the International Workshop on Genotoxicity Test Procedures (IWGTP), discussed protocols for the conduct of established and proposed micronucleus assays at a meeting held March 25-26, 1999 in Washington, DC, in conjunction with the annual meeting of the Environmental Mutagen Society. The working group reached consensus on a number issues, including: (1) protocols using repeated dosing in mice and rats; (2) integration of the (rodent erythrocyte) micronucleus assay into general toxicology studies; (3) the possible omission of concurrently-treated positive control animals from the assay; (4) automation of micronucleus scoring by flow cytometry or image analysis; (5) criteria for regulatory acceptance; (6) detection of aneuploidy induction in the micronucleus assay; and (7) micronucleus assays in tissues (germ cells, other organs, neonatal tissue) other than bone marrow. This report summarizes the discussions and recommendations of this working group. In the classic rodent erythrocyte assay, treatment schedules using repeated dosing of mice or rats, and integration of assays using such schedules into short-term toxicology studies, were considered acceptable as long as certain study criteria were met. When the micronucleus assay is integrated into ongoing toxicology studies, relatively short-term repeated-dose studies should be used preferentially because there is not yet sufficient data to demonstrate that conservative dose selection in longer term studies (longer than 1 month) does not reduce the sensitivity of the assay. Additional validation data are needed to resolve this point. In studies with mice, either bone marrow or blood was considered acceptable as the tissue for assessing micronucleus induction, provided that the absence of spleen function has been verified in the animal strains used. In studies with rats, the principal endpoint should be the frequency of micronucleated immature erythrocytes in bone marrow, although scoring of peripheral blood samples gives important supplementary data about the time course of micronucleus induction. When dose concentration and stability are verified appropriately, concurrent treatment with a positive control agent is not necessary. Control of staining and scoring procedures can be obtained by including appropriate reference samples that have been obtained from a separate experiment. For studies in rats or mice, treatment/sampling regimens should include treatment at intervals of no more than 24 hr (unless the test article has a half-life of more than 24 hr) with sampling of bone marrow or blood, respectively, within 24 or 40 hr after the last treatment. The use of a DNA specific stain is recommended for the identification of micronuclei, especially for studies in the rat. In the case of a negative assay result with a non-toxic test article, it is desirable that systemic exposure to the test article is demonstrated. The group concluded that successful application of automated scoring by both flow cytometry and image analysis had been achieved, and defined criteria that should be met if automated scoring is employed. It was not felt appropriate to attempt to define specific recommended protocols for automated scoring at the present time. Other issues reviewed and discussed by the working group included micronucleus assays that have been developed in a number of tissues other than bone marrow. The group felt that these assays were useful research tools that could also be used to elucidate mechanisms in certain regulatory situations, but that these assays had not yet been standardized and validated for routine regulatory application. Copyright 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
机译:作为基因毒性测试程序国际研讨会(IWGTP)的一部分而组成的体内微核分析专家工作组,在1999年3月25日至26日于华盛顿举行的会议上讨论了进行已建立和提议的微核分析的方案, DC,以及环境诱变学会年会。工作组在许多问题上达成共识,包括:(1)在小鼠和大鼠中使用重复剂量的方案; (2)将(鼠红细胞)微核试验整合到一般的毒理学研究中; (3)分析中可能省略了同时治疗的阳性对照动物; (4)通过流式细胞仪或图像分析自动对微核评分; (5)监管接受标准; (6)在微核分析中检测非整倍性诱导; (7)除骨髓以外的组织(生殖细胞,其他器官,新生儿组织)中的微核化验。本报告总结了该工作组的讨论和建议。在经典的啮齿类动物红细胞试验中,只要符合某些研究标准,就可以认为使用重复给药小鼠或大鼠的治疗方案以及将使用这种方案的试验整合到短期毒理学研究中是可以接受的。当将微核检测法整合到正在进行的毒理学研究中时,应优先使用相对短期的重复剂量研究,因为尚无足够的数据证明长期研究(超过1个月)中的保守剂量选择不会减少测定的灵敏度。需要其他验证数据才能解决此问题。在小鼠研究中,只要已在所用动物品系中证实了脾功能的缺失,就可以将骨髓或血液视为评估微核诱导的组织。在大鼠研究中,主要终点应为骨髓中微核未成熟红细胞的频率,尽管外周血样品的评分可提供有关微核诱导时间过程的重要补充数据。如果适当地验证了剂量浓度和稳定性,则无需同时使用阳性对照剂进行治疗。可以通过加入适当的参考样品(从单独的实验中获得)来控制染色和评分程序。对于在大鼠或小鼠中进行的研究,治疗/采样方案应包括间隔不超过24小时的治疗(除非测试物品的半衰期超过24小时),并分别在24小时内采样骨髓或血液或最后一次治疗后40小时。建议使用DNA特异性染色剂来鉴定微核,尤其是在大鼠中进行研究。在无毒测试物品的阴性测定结果的情况下,希望证明系统暴露于测试物品。该小组的结论是,通过流式细胞术和图像分析成功实现了自动评分,并确定了使用自动评分时应满足的标准。目前认为尝试定义用于自动评分的特定推荐协议是不合适的。工作组审查和讨论的其他问题包括在除骨髓以外的许多组织中开发的微核分析。该小组认为,这些测定法是有用的研究工具,也可用于阐明某些监管情况下的机制,但是这些测定法尚未标准化,并且无法用于常规监管应用。版权所有2000 Wiley-Liss,Inc.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号