首页> 外文期刊>Environment and Ecology >Quality of Cocoa Beans in Small Scale Processing as Influenced by Methods of Drying and Season
【24h】

Quality of Cocoa Beans in Small Scale Processing as Influenced by Methods of Drying and Season

机译:干燥和季节方法对小规模加工中可可豆质量的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The experiment was conducted to analyze the feasibility of resorting to artificial drying in small scale processing of cocoa to reduce the drying period or for drying during adverse climatic conditions. Sun drying and artificial drying with the help of a cabinet drier were tried for two seasons. In cabinet drying the moisture removal was fast compared to sun drying method. The initial moisture of 57.74% of fermented beans was reduced to around 6% by 4 days in cabinet method and 9 days in sun drying. With regard to pH of the beans during drying, there was a gradual increase in both the methods though, there was no significant difference between the methods. Analysis of biochemical parameters (polyphenol, amino acid and anthocyanin content) revealed that sun drying was better with respect to quality of cured beans. During the April--May season a superior cut test score of 55.53 was observed in sun dried samples as compared to 36.75 for cabinet dried samples. Recovery percent was also higher in sun dried samples i.e. 39.09 and 38.11% respectively during April--May and October--November whereas it was 32.09 and 33.13% respectively for cabinet dried samples. Improved quality in sun drying could be due to the better removal of acids and improvement of flavor though better amino acid formation. Thus, though drying was faster in artificial method in both the seasons, considering the quality of beans, slow sun drying is preferred. Artificial drying can be resorted to during adverse climatic conditions as in the second season to save the beans from spoilage.
机译:进行该实验以分析在小规模可可加工中采用人工干燥以减少干燥时间或在不利气候条件下进行干燥的可行性。在橱柜干燥机的帮助下进行了太阳干燥和人工干燥两个季节。与阳光干燥法相比,在橱柜干燥中水分去除速度快。在柜内方法中,经过4天和在阳光下干燥9天,发酵豆的初始水分降至57.74%,降至约6%。关于豆在干燥过程中的pH,两种方法都有逐渐增加的趋势,但两种方法之间没有显着差异。对生化参数(多酚,氨基酸和花色苷含量)的分析表明,晒干相对于熟豆的质量更好。在四月至五月的季节中,晒干样品的切分测试得分为55.53,而橱柜干燥样品的切分测试得分为36.75。晒干样品的回收率也更高,分别为4月-5月和10月-11月,分别为39.09%和38.11%,而橱柜干燥样品的回收率分别为32.09%和33.13%。尽管更好地形成了氨基酸,但日晒干燥后质量的提高可能是由于更好地去除了酸并改善了风味。因此,尽管在两个季节中用人工方法干燥都比较快,但考虑到豆子的质量,慢晒是优选的。在不利的气候条件下(如第二季),可采取人工干燥措施,以免咖啡豆变质。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号