首页> 外文期刊>Environmental science & policy >Translating soil science into environmental policy: A case study on implementing the EU soil protection strategy in The Netherlands
【24h】

Translating soil science into environmental policy: A case study on implementing the EU soil protection strategy in The Netherlands

机译:将土壤科学转化为环境政策:以在荷兰实施欧盟土壤保护战略为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The EU Commission has proposed a way forward towards a Thematic Strategy for Soil Protection based on the distinction of seven soil functions and eight threats. A Technical Working Group on Research defined some 200 general priority research areas in the context of the dynamic DPSIR approach considering drivers, pressures, states, impacts and responses. Though quite valuable as a source document, this may be too generic and academic to be a starting point for new, effective soil research in different regions of the EU. A six-step storyline procedure is therefore proposed aimed at deriving effective operational procedures for a water management unit in a given region, using available soil expertise and defining new research only where needed. The procedure, that was illustrated for a Dutch case study, consists of defining: (i) water management units (wmu's) in a landscape context; (ii) land-use, area hydrology and soil functions (iii) soil threats and relevant soil qualities; (iv) drivers of land-use change and their future impact; (v) improvement of relevant soil qualities; (vi) possibilities to institutionalize soil quality improvement as part of the EU soil protection strategy. A focus on regional wmu's is likely to result in a strong commitment of local stakeholders and governmental officials, allowing a more specific DPSIR approach. But this will only work if local officials also receive legal powers to develop and enforce codified 'good practices', to be developed in the context of communities of practice. Innovative research topics can be derived from a combined analysis of experiences within different communities of practice in different wmu's and should not be left to researchers to define. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:欧盟委员会根据七个土壤功能和八种威胁的区别,提出了实现土壤保护主题战略的方法。一个研究技术工作组在动态DPSIR方法的背景下定义了约200个一般优先研究领域,其中考虑了动因,压力,状态,影响和响应。尽管作为原始文件而言非常有价值,但它可能过于笼统且学术性不足,无法成为欧盟不同地区进行新型有效土壤研究的起点。因此,提出了一个六步的故事情节程序,旨在利用给定的土壤知识并仅在需要时定义新的研究,从而得出给定区域内水管理部门的有效操作程序。在荷兰的案例研究中说明了该程序,该程序包括定义:(i)景观环境中的水资源管理单位(wmu); (ii)土地利用,区域水文学和土壤功能(iii)土壤威胁和相关的土壤质量; (iv)土地用途变化的驱动因素及其未来影响; (v)改善相关的土壤质量; (vi)将土壤质量改良制度化的可能性,作为欧盟土壤保护战略的一部分。专注于区域WMU可能会导致地方利益相关者和政府官员的坚定承诺,从而允许采用更具体的DPSIR方法。但这只有在地方官员还具有发展和执行法规化的“良好做法”(在实践社区的背景下发展)的法律权力的情况下才有效。创新的研究主题可以从对不同wmu的不同实践社区内的经验的综合分析中得出,因此不应由研究人员来定义。 (C)2007 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号