首页> 外文期刊>Environmental science & policy >To kill or not to kill-Practitioners' opinions on invasive alien species management as a step towards enhancing control of biological invasions
【24h】

To kill or not to kill-Practitioners' opinions on invasive alien species management as a step towards enhancing control of biological invasions

机译:杀死或不杀死从业者关于外来入侵物种管理的观点,以此作为加强对生物入侵的控制的一步

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The spread of invasive alien species (IAS) has become an increasingly important environmental, social and economic issue in almost all regions of the world. To have the capacity to effectively counter the effects of invasions, besides basic research on invasion processes and the ecological impacts of IAS, there is a need to get an information and better understanding of the effectiveness of biological control and its social acceptability. Conservation practitioners are a particular group of stakeholders as they act in the first line to undertake control actions again IAS spread. Yet, not many research was done to deliver quantitative, comprehensive information on practitioners' knowledge and attitudes towards IAS. In this paper, we present a study from Poland a country with relatively well preserved nature, yet currently facing the problem of biological invasions in the terrestrial and aquatic environments. We investigated nature conservation practitioners' knowledge of biological invasions, their views on the principles and methods of IAS control, and their degree of acceptance of control methods. We conducted a survey among people professionally involved in nature conservation in Poland and collected 916 questionnaires (out of 3330 sent). Overall, we find that conservation practitioners in Poland accept the use of radical methods of control, yet they differ about the use of various types of control method, and about the various control methods application to various systematic groups. Also, the level of practitioners' knowledge is rather limited both in relation to correct identification of IAS, as well as to knowledge on legal regulations. We also highlight significant differences between decision-makers and professionals not perceiving themselves as decisive over IAS management. We show examples suggesting that nature conservation practitioners may not hold well-formed opinions on the principles and methods of dealing with alien species. This is surely an important deficit to overcome to enhance the effectiveness of IAS control. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:外来入侵物种(IAS)的扩散已成为世界几乎所有地区日益重要的环境,社会和经济问题。为了有能力有效地应对入侵的影响,除了对入侵过程和IAS的生态影响进行基础研究之外,还需要获得信息并更好地了解生物防治的有效性及其社会可接受性。保护从业者是利益相关者的特殊群体,因为他们在第一线行动是要再次采取控制行动,IAS也要传播。但是,没有进行太多研究来提供有关从业者对IAS的知识和态度的定量,全面的信息。在本文中,我们从波兰进行了一项研究,该国自然保护相对良好,但目前面临着陆地和水生生物入侵的问题。我们调查了自然保护从业人员对生物入侵的了解,他们对IAS控制原理和方法的看法以及对控制方法的接受程度。我们对波兰从事自然保护的专业人员进行了调查,收集了916份问卷(发送了3330份问卷)。总体而言,我们发现波兰的保护从业人员接受激进的控制方法的使用,但是他们在使用各种类型的控制方法以及将各种控制方法应用于各种系统群体方面有所不同。同样,从IAS的正确识别以及法律法规方面的知识来看,从业者的知识水平受到很大限制。我们还强调了决策者与专业人士之间的重大差异,他们并不认为自己对IAS管理具有决定性作用。我们显示了一些实例,表明自然保护从业人员可能未对处理外来物种的原则和方法持有格式正确的意见。这无疑是要增强IAS控制有效性所要克服的重要缺陷。 (C)2016 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号