...
首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Practice >Hudson River PCB Dredging: Midcourse Assessment and Implications Regarding Possible Project Continuation Versus Termination
【24h】

Hudson River PCB Dredging: Midcourse Assessment and Implications Regarding Possible Project Continuation Versus Termination

机译:哈德逊河PCB疏ed:中途评估及对可能的项目延续与终止的启示

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Phase 1 of Hudson River dredging fractionally reduced the amount of polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB)-contaminated sediment remaining in the river bottom, but greatly increased its downstream transport, as "clamshell" dredge buckets leaked more material than they retained. Clamshells were especially inefficient at capturing liquid PCBs and PCBs adsorbed to silt and fine sediment. Material that was removed, therefore, was relatively coarse, and contained relatively little PCB. Volume reduction was achieved only at the expense of massive mobilization of liquid, colloidal, and adsorbed forms of PCB, spreading contamination to previously uncontaminated river areas. We estimate that Phase 1 increased the surface area of contaminated riverbed by at least 3 orders of magnitude, from about 50 dredged acres to many square miles. PCB entry into ecosystems, water, and air depends upon the surface area of contaminated sediment newly exposed to scouring from the riverbed, causing further downstream transport, especially in high-flow events over years or decades. Indeed, Phase I contravened EPA's benefit criterion by mobilizing PCB at a higher rate than would occur naturally, without dredging, over the planned seven-year project duration. If dredging is to continue, therefore, Phase 2 must assure health risk acceptability and net benefit compared with no actiono dredging. Further, EPA's benefit criterion must be revised to account for impacts of PCB mobilization to ecosystems and air, not just resuspension to water. Finally, Phase 2 must increase the scope and duration of environmental monitoring to enable more reliable warning of harm in real time, and project evaluation over decades. We recommend that EPA consider for Phase 2 such technologies as coffer damming, vacuum dredging, and dredging within enclosures to minimize sediment resuspension; mobilization of liquid, colloidal, and adsorbed forms of PCB; and PCB entry into ecosystems and air. If Phase 2 cannot assure health risk acceptability and comply with a revised benefit criterion, we recommend that EPA terminate the dredging project.
机译:哈德逊河疏1工程的一期工程部分减少了河底残留的多氯联苯(PCB)污染的沉积物,但由于“翻盖式”疏edge桶泄漏的物料多于其保留量,因此大大增加了其下游运输量。翻盖在捕获液态PCB以及吸附到淤泥和细小沉积物中的PCB方面效率特别低。因此,被去除的材料相对较粗糙,并且包含的​​PCB相对较少。仅以大量动员液态,胶态和吸附形式的多氯联苯为代价,才能实现减少体积的目的,从而将污染扩散到以前未受污染的河流地区。我们估计,第一阶段将受污染的河床的表面积增加了至少3个数量级,从大约50英亩的疏to土地扩大到许多平方英里。多氯联苯进入生态系统,水和空气的过程取决于新暴露于河床冲刷的污染沉积物的表面积,从而导致进一步的下游运输,尤其是在数年或数十年的高流量事件中。确实,第一阶段违反了EPA的收益标准,在计划的7年项目期限内动员了多于自然发生的PCB,而没有疏without。因此,如果要继续进行疏ed,那么与不采取行动/不疏no相比,第二阶段必须确保健康风险的可接受性和净收益。此外,必须修订EPA的收益标准,以考虑到PCB迁移对生态系统和空气的影响,而不仅仅是对水的悬浮。最后,第二阶段必须扩大环境监测的范围和持续时间,以实现对损害的实时更可靠的警告,以及数十年的项目评估。我们建议EPA在第2阶段考虑采用围堰,真空疏,和围墙内疏ed等技术,以最大程度地减少沉积物的再悬浮。动员液态,胶体和吸附形式的多氯联苯; PCB进入生态系统和空气。如果第二阶段不能确保健康风险的可接受性并符合修订后的收益标准,我们建议EPA终止疏the项目。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号