...
首页> 外文期刊>Endocrine practice: official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists >Sitagliptin compared with thiazolidinediones as a third-line oral antihyperglycemic agent in type 2 diabetes mellitus.
【24h】

Sitagliptin compared with thiazolidinediones as a third-line oral antihyperglycemic agent in type 2 diabetes mellitus.

机译:西格列汀与噻唑烷二酮类药物比较是2型糖尿病的三线口服降糖药。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To compare sitagliptin and thiazolidinediones as third-line oral antihyperglycemic agents among ethnic minority patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus. METHODS: In an open-label, single-arm design, we treated type 2 diabetic patients who had suboptimal diabetes control on maximum tolerated dosages of metformin plus sulfonylureas with the addition of sitagliptin, 100 mg daily, and compared their responses with findings from a historical control group of similar patients treated with rosiglitazone, 8 mg daily, or pioglitazone, 45 mg daily, as their third-line oral agent. Patients were assessed bimonthly, and those who achieved hemoglobin A1c levels less than 7.5% at 4 months continued through 1 year of follow-up. RESULTS: One hundred eight patients were treated with sitagliptin, and 104 patients constituted the historical control group treated with rosiglitazone or pioglitazone. At baseline, sitagliptin- and thiazolidinedione-treated patients had identical hemoglobin A1c levels (mean +/- SD) (9.4 +/- 1.8% and 9.4 +/- 1.9%, respectively) and similar known diabetes duration (6.7 +/- 5.0 years and 7.6 +/- 5.8 years, respectively). Hemoglobin A1c was reduced in both groups at 4 months (P<.001), but the reduction was greater with thiazolidinediones than with sitagliptin (-2.0 +/- 1.7% vs -1.3 +/- 1.8%; P = .006), as was the proportion of patients achieving a hemoglobin A1c level less than 7.5% (62% vs 46%; P = .026). Of all patients achieving a hemoglobin A1c level less than 7.5% at 4 months, the same proportions in each group sustained their hemoglobin A1c level less than 7.5% by 12 months (59% vs 58%). Sitagliptin was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Among ethnic minority patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes while taking maximum tolerated dosages of metformin and sulfonylureas, third-line add-on therapy with a thiazolidinedione controlled hyperglycemia more effectively than sitagliptin after 4 months.
机译:目的:比较西格列汀和噻唑烷二酮类药物在少数2型糖尿病患者中控制不佳的少数民族患者中作为三线口服降糖药的作用。方法:在开放标签,单臂设计中,我们治疗了2型糖尿病患者,这些患者在最大耐受剂量的二甲双胍和磺脲类药物控制不佳的情况下,每天加用西他列汀100 mg,并将他们的反应与A型糖尿病的发现进行比较。历史对照组类似患者接受三线口服口服药物罗格列酮每天8 mg或吡格列酮每天45 mg。每两个月对患者进行一次评估,并且在4个月内血红蛋白A1c水平低于7.5%的患者继续进行1年的随访。结果:西格列汀治疗108例,罗格列酮或吡格列酮治疗历史对照组104例。在基线时,西他列汀和噻唑烷二酮治疗的患者血红蛋白A1c水平相同(平均+/- SD)(分别为9.4 +/- 1.8%和9.4 +/- 1.9%),并且已知的糖尿病持续时间相似(6.7 +/- 5.0年和7.6 +/- 5.8年)。两组的血红蛋白A1c均在4个月时降低(P <.001),但是噻唑烷二酮类药物的降幅大于西他列汀(-2.0 +/- 1.7%vs -1.3 +/- 1.8%; P = .006),达到血红蛋白A1c水平低于7.5%的患者比例(62%比46%; P = .026)。在4个月内血红蛋白A1c水平低于7.5%的所有患者中,每组相同的比例在12个月内维持其血红蛋白A1c水平低于7.5%(59%对58%)。西他列汀耐受性良好。结论:在少数2型糖尿病控制不佳的少数民族患者中,二甲双胍和磺脲类药物的最大耐受剂量为4个月后,噻唑烷二酮三线联合治疗比西他列汀更有效地控制了高血糖。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号