...
首页> 外文期刊>Endoscopy: Journal for Clinical Use Biopsy and Technique >Comparison of prophylactic clip and endoloop application for the prevention of postpolypectomy bleeding in pedunculated colonic polyps: A prospective, randomized, multicenter study
【24h】

Comparison of prophylactic clip and endoloop application for the prevention of postpolypectomy bleeding in pedunculated colonic polyps: A prospective, randomized, multicenter study

机译:预防性钳夹和内环套用于预防带蒂结肠息肉的息肉切除术后出血的比较:一项前瞻性,随机,多中心研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background and study aims: The effectiveness of the prophylactic clip for the prevention of postpolypectomy bleeding in pedunculated colonic polyps has not been confirmed. The aim of this prospective, randomized study was to compare the efficacy of prophylactic clip and endoloop application in the prevention of postpolypectomy bleeding in large pedunculated polyps. Patients and methods: A total of 195 patients who had pedunculated colorectal polyps, with heads ≥10mm and stalks ≥5mm in diameter, were included in the study between July 2010 and January 2013. Polyps were randomized to receive either clips or endoloops. Both devices were applied to the base of the stalk before conventional snare polypectomy. Bleeding complications were analyzed with a noninferiority margin of 5%. Results: A total of 203 polyps were included in the study (98 in the clip group and 105 in the endoloop group). Bleeding occurred after five polypectomies in the clip group (5.1%) and after six in the endoloop group (5.7%) (P=0.847). Noninferiority of the prophylactic clip to the endoloop could not be confirmed (absolute bleeding rate difference-0.6%, 95% confidence interval -5.6% to 6.8%) due to small sample size. Immediate bleeding episodes occurred in 4/5 polyps in the clip group and 5/6 polyps in the endoloop group. Delayed bleeding occurred in one polyp in each group. Conclusions: These results suggest that the application of a prophylactic clip is as effective and safe as an endoloop in the prevention of postpolypectomy bleeding in large pedunculated colonic polyps. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01406379).
机译:背景和研究目的:预防性预防夹对预防带蒂结肠息肉的息肉切除术后出血的有效性尚未得到证实。这项前瞻性,随机研究的目的是比较预防性卡箍和内环套管在预防大有蒂息肉的息肉切除术后出血中的功效。患者和方法:2010年7月至2013年1月,共有195例有蒂的大肠息肉的患者,其头部≥10mm,茎梗的直径≥5mm。将息肉随机分为夹子或内环。在常规的圈套息肉切除术之前,将两种装置都应用到茎的根部。分析出血并发症的非劣效性为5%。结果:总共包括203个息肉(夹子组98个,内环组105个)。夹子组有5个多视野检查后发生出血(5.1%),内环组有6个检查后出血(5.7%)(P = 0.847)。由于样本量小,无法确定预防性夹子对内环的非劣效性(绝对出血率差异-0.6%,95%置信区间-5.6%至6.8%)。夹子组的4/5息肉和内环组的5/6息肉立即发生出血事件。每组一个息肉发生延迟性出血。结论:这些结果表明,预防性带夹的应用与内环在预防大带蒂结肠息肉的息肉切除术后出血方面一样有效和安全。临床试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov(NCT01406379)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号