...
首页> 外文期刊>Endoscopy: Journal for Clinical Use Biopsy and Technique >Comparison of hemostatic forceps with soft coagulation versus argon plasma coagulation for bleeding peptic ulcer - a randomized trial
【24h】

Comparison of hemostatic forceps with soft coagulation versus argon plasma coagulation for bleeding peptic ulcer - a randomized trial

机译:止血钳与软凝和氩血浆凝结治疗消化性溃疡出血的比较-一项随机试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background and study aims: Endoscopic high-frequency soft coagulation is used to manage visible bleeding or nonbleeding vessels during endoscopic submucosal dissection. The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy of he-mostasis by soft coagulation (using hemostatic forceps) with argon plasma coagulation (APC), in a prospective randomized trial. Patients and methods: From January 2013 to June 2014, 276 patients were randomly assigned into two groups: epinephrine injection plus APC (the APC group); or epinephrine injection plus soft coagulation using hemostatic forceps (the HFSC group). As the primary outcome we compared recurrent bleeding rates within 30 days after initial hemostasis in a noninferiority design.
机译:背景与研究目的:内镜下高频软凝治疗内镜黏膜下剥离术中可见的出血或不出血的血管。本研究的目的是在一项前瞻性随机试验中比较软凝(使用止血钳)与氩气血浆凝结(APC)进行的止血效果。患者和方法:2013年1月至2014年6月,将276例患者随机分为两组:肾上腺素注射液加APC(APC组);或肾上腺素注射液加止血钳软凝(HFSC组)。作为主要结果,我们比较了非劣效设计中止血后30天内的复发出血率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号