...
首页> 外文期刊>Endoscopy: Journal for Clinical Use Biopsy and Technique >Catheter probe extraductal ultrasonography vs. conventional endoscopic ultrasonography for detection of bile duct stones.
【24h】

Catheter probe extraductal ultrasonography vs. conventional endoscopic ultrasonography for detection of bile duct stones.

机译:导管探头导管外超声检查与常规内镜超声检查相比,可检测胆管结石。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) has been established as a valuable diagnostic tool for the detection of bile duct stones (BDS). The recently introduced extraductal endoscopic ultrasonography (EDUS) using miniprobes has the advantage that it can be performed with a duodenoscope, and if therapeutic interventions become necessary, there is no need to change the scope. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients with acute biliary pain and a dilated bile duct and/or elevated liver function tests, in whom the origin of biliary obstruction could not be identified by US and CT, were enrolled. The patients were investigated with a linear-array echoendoscope, and an additional transduodenal EDUS examination was performed with a 12-MHz miniprobe via the instrumentation channel of the echoendoscope. The presence or absence of BDS was afterwards evaluated by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)/sphincterotomy (EST) and by instrumental bile duct exploration (in the case of a positive EUS/EDUS finding), or by magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and ERCP with additional clinical follow-up (in the case of negative findings on EUS/EDUS). RESULTS: One hundred and fifty-five patients (55 +/- 12 years old, 98 female) were enrolled. In six cases, the distal bile duct could not be successfully visualized by EDUS, whereas with EUS visualization failed in only one patient ( P = 0.13). Choledocholithiasis was proven in 75 cases (48 %). The diagnostic accuracy of EUS for the detection of BDS (sensitivity 92 %, specificity 100 %, PPV 1.0, NPV 0.93, accuracy 95 %) was comparable to that of EDUS (sensitivity 90 %, specificity 98 %, PPV 0.99, NPV 0.93, accuracy 91 %, P = 0.17 vs. EUS). CONCLUSIONS: In patients at intermediate risk of BDS it seems to be justified to perform EDUS instead of EUS, and to proceed with ERCP and EST immediately when findings are positive.
机译:背景与研究目的:内镜超声检查(EUS)已被确立为检测胆管结石(BDS)的有价值的诊断工具。最近推出的使用微型探头的导管外内镜超声检查(EDUS)的优势在于可以用十二指肠镜进行检查,并且如果有必要进行治疗干预,则无需更改范围。患者和方法:入选了连续性胆汁急性疼痛和胆管扩张和/或肝功能检查结果升高的患者,其中US和CT无法确定胆道梗阻的起源。使用线性阵列超声内窥镜对患者进行了研究,并通过超声内窥镜的仪器通道使用12 MHz微型探头进行了额外的十二指肠EDUS检查。随后通过内窥镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)/括约肌切开术(EST)和仪器胆管探查(在EUS / EDUS呈阳性的情况下)或磁共振胆胰管造影术(MRCP)和ERCP评估BDS的存在与否并进行额外的临床随访(在EUS / EDUS阴性的情况下)。结果:纳入155例患者(55 +/- 12岁,女性98例)。在6例病例中,EDUS无法成功观察远端胆管,而只有1例患者进行EUS观察失败。胆总管结石症已被证实为75例(48%)。 EUS对BDS的诊断准确性(灵敏度92%,特异性100%,PPV 1.0,NPV 0.93,准确性95%)与EDUS的诊断准确性(灵敏度90%,特异性98%,PPV 0.99,NPV 0.93,准确度为91%,P = 0.17对EUS)。结论:对于处于BDS中度危险中的患者,似乎有理由进行EDUS而不是EUS,并在发现阳性后立即进行ERCP和EST。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号