首页> 外文期刊>Earth-Science Reviews: The International Geological Journal Bridging the Gap between Research Articles and Textbooks >Aeolian transport of coarse sand over beach ridges in NE Australia: A reply to a discussion of 'Beach ridges and prograded beach deposits as palaeoenvironment records'
【24h】

Aeolian transport of coarse sand over beach ridges in NE Australia: A reply to a discussion of 'Beach ridges and prograded beach deposits as palaeoenvironment records'

机译:澳大利亚东北部海滩脊上的粗沙风沙运输:对“海滩脊和发达海滩沉积物作为古环境记录”的讨论的答复

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Nott (2013) argued that Tamura's (2012) review of beach ridges as palaeoenvironment records comprises an incorrect interpretation of the processes of building coarse sand beach ridges in NEAustralia.Nott (2013) stressed no possibility of aeolian transport of coarse sand onto beach ridges during both cyclone and non-cyclone conditions. The facts presented by Nott (2013) however fail to completely rule out the possibility that aeolian transport could be at least contributing to the building of the beach ridges. This reply aims to clarify the original intentions of Tamura (2012),which Nott (2013) appears to havemisunderstood, and further examines the possibility of aeolian transport of coarse sand onto the beach ridges from incipient ridges. If this does occur, then it is appropriate to question how this might affect the theory and algorithm employed by Nott et al. (2009) and Forsyth et al. (2010) to assess the intensity and frequency of prehistoric cyclone landfall.
机译:Nott(2013)认为Tamura(2012)对滩脊作为古环境记录的回顾包括对NEAustralia的粗沙滩脊建造过程的错误解释.Nott(2013)强调在此期间不可能将粗沙风沙输送到滩脊旋风和非旋风条件。但是,Nott(2013)提出的事实并不能完全排除风能运输至少可以促进海滩山脊建设的可能性。该答复旨在澄清田村(2012)的初衷,诺特(2013)似乎对此有误解,并进一步检验了风沙将粗砂从初始山脊向海滩山脊进行风沙输送的可能性。如果确实发生了这种情况,那么就应该质疑这会如何影响Nott等人所采用的理论和算法。 (2009)和Forsyth等。 (2010)评估史前气旋登陆的强度和频率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号