首页> 外文期刊>Educational studies in mathematics >Finnish pre-service teachers' and upper secondarystudents' understanding of division and reasoningstrategies used
【24h】

Finnish pre-service teachers' and upper secondarystudents' understanding of division and reasoningstrategies used

机译:芬兰职前教师和高中生对所使用的划分和推理策略的理解

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this paper, we focus on Finnish pre-service elementary teachers' (N=269) andupper secondary students' (N=1,434) understanding of division. In the questionnaire, weused the following non-standard division problem: "We know that 498:6=83. How couldyou conclude from this relationship (without using long-division algorithm) what 491:6=?is?" This problem especially measures conceptual understanding, adaptive reasoning, andprocedural fluency. Based on the results, we can conclude that division seems not to befully understood: 45% of the pre-service teachers and 37% of upper secondary studentswere able to produce complete or mainly correct solutions. The reasoning strategies used bythese two groups did not differ very much. We identified four main reasons for problems inunderstanding this task: (1) staying on the integer level, (2) an inability to handle theremainder, (3) difficulties in understanding the relationships between different operations,and (4) insufficient reasoning strategies. It seems that learners' reasoning strategies inparticular play a central role when teachers try to improve learners' proficiency.
机译:在本文中,我们重点关注芬兰的职前小学教师(N = 269)和高中学生(N = 1434)对划分的理解。在问卷中,我们使用了以下非标准划分问题:“我们知道498:6 = 83。如何从这种关系中得出结论(不使用长除法算法),491:6 =?是什么?”这个问题尤其衡量了概念上的理解,适应性推理和过程流利程度。根据这些结果,我们可以得出结论,似乎似乎还没有完全理解部门划分:45%的职前教师和37%的高中学生能够提出完整或主要正确的解决方案。这两个小组使用的推理策略差异不大。我们确定了理解此任务的问题的四个主要原因:(1)停留在整数级别上;(2)无法处理其余部分;(3)难以理解不同操作之间的关系;(4)推理策略不足。看来,当教师尝试提高学习者的能力时,学习者的推理策略尤其起着核心作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号