...
首页> 外文期刊>Earth Surface Processes and Landforms: The journal of the British Geomorphological Research Group >Causes and underlying processes of measurement variability in field erosion plots in Mediterranean conditions
【24h】

Causes and underlying processes of measurement variability in field erosion plots in Mediterranean conditions

机译:地中海条件下田间侵蚀区测量变化的原因和潜在过程

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

An understanding of the sources of variation in the use of erosion plots and of their feasibility to meet the objectives of each specific research project is key to improving future field designs, selecting data for modelling purposes and furthering knowledge of soil erosion processes. Our own field experiences from ongoing research on soil erosion processes since 1989, have allowed us to detect several methodological problems that cause measurement variability. Here several examples are presented concerning: (i) differences in long-term soil erosion data between open and closed plots, (ii) differences in soil loss derived from replica soil erosion plots; and (iii) differences in soil loss data derived from plots at a range of spatial scales. Closed plots are not the most suitable method for long-term monitoring of soil erosion rates due to the risk of exhaustion of available material within the plot. The difference in time after which exhaustion occurs depends on the surface soil characteristics, the climatological conditions and the size of the plots. We detected four and seven years as 'time to exhaustion'. Different results are frequently obtained between pairs of replica plots. Differences up to a factor of nine have been detected in total soil loss between replica plots due to different spatial patterns of surface components. Different constraints appear depending on the spatial scale of measurement of soil loss. We obtained lower runoff percentages at coarser scales; however, larger sediment concentrations are observed at coarser scales (1.32 g l(-1), catchment; 0-30 g l(-1), 30 m(2); 0-17 g l(-1), 1 m(2) scales). The smaller the plot, the larger the hydrological disconnection within the system, the lower the energy flows due to short distances and the quicker the response to runoff due to an artificial decrease of concentration times for continuous How. Copyright (c) 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
机译:了解侵蚀图的变化来源及其满足每个特定研究项目目标的可行性,对于改进未来的田间设计,选择用于建模目的的数据以及进一步了解土壤侵蚀过程至关重要。自1989年以来对土壤侵蚀过程的持续研究,我们自己的现场经验使我们能够发现导致测量变化的几种方法学问题。这里列举了几个有关以下方面的例子:(i)开放和封闭地块之间长期土壤侵蚀数据的差异;(ii)从复制土壤侵蚀地块得出的土壤流失差异; (iii)从一定范围的空间尺度上得出的土壤流失数据的差异。封闭的地块不是长期监测土壤侵蚀速率的最合适方法,因为存在地块内可用物质耗尽的风险。耗尽时间的不同取决于表层土壤的特性,气候条件和样地的大小。我们将四到七年视为“精疲力尽”。通常在成对的复制图之间会获得不同的结果。由于地表成分的空间格局不同,在重复样地之间的总土壤流失中发现的差异高达九倍。根据土壤流失测量的空间尺度,会出现不同的约束条件。在较粗的尺度上,我们获得了较低的径流百分比。但是,在较粗的尺度上观察到较大的沉积物浓度(1.32 gl(-1),流域; 0-30 gl(-1),30 m(2); 0-17 gl(-1),1 m(2)尺度)。地块越小,系统内的水文中断越大,由于距离短而导致的能量流越低,并且由于人为地减少了连续河道的集中时间,对径流的响应也更快。版权所有(c)2006 John Wiley&Sons,Ltd.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号