...
首页> 外文期刊>Earth Surface Processes and Landforms: The journal of the British Geomorphological Research Group >Dating young geomorphic surfaces using age of colonizing Douglas fir in southwestern Washington and northwestern Oregon, USA
【24h】

Dating young geomorphic surfaces using age of colonizing Douglas fir in southwestern Washington and northwestern Oregon, USA

机译:利用美国华盛顿西南部和俄勒冈州西北部定居的道格拉斯冷杉的年龄对年轻的地貌表面进行测年

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Dating of dynamic, young (<500 years) geomorphic landforms, particularly volcanofluvial features, requires higher precision than is possible with radiocarbon dating. Minimum ages of recently created landforms have long been obtained from tree-ring ages of the oldest trees growing on new surfaces. But to estimate the year of landform creation requires that two time corrections be added to tree ages obtained from increment cores: (1) the time interval between stabilization of the new landform surface and germination of the sampled trees (germination lag time or GLT); and (2) the interval between seedling germination and growth to sampling height, if the trees are not cored at ground level. The sum of these two time intervals is the colonization time gap (CTG). Such time corrections have been needed for more precise dating of terraces and floodplains in lowland river valleys in the Cascade Range, where significant eruption-induced lateral shifting and vertical aggradation of channels can occur over years to decades, and where timing of such geomorphic changes can be critical to emergency planning. Earliest colonizing Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) were sampled for tree-ring dating at eight sites on lowland (<750 m a.s.l.), recently formed surfaces of known age near three Cascade volcanoes - Mount Rainier, Mount St. Helens and Mount Hood - in southwestern Washington and northwestern Oregon. Increment cores or stem sections were taken at breast height and, where possible, at ground level from the largest, oldest-looking trees at each study site. At least ten trees were sampled at each site unless the total of early colonizers was less. Results indicate that a correction of four years should be used for GLT and 10 years for CTG if the single largest (and presumed oldest) Douglas fir growing on a surface of unknown age is sampled. This approach would have a potential error of up to 20 years. Error can be reduced by sampling the five largest Douglas fir instead of the single largest. A GLT correction of 5 years should be added to the mean ring-count age of the five largest trees growing on the surface being dated, if the trees are cored at ground level. This correction would have an approximate error of years. If the trees are cored at about 1? m above the ground surface (breast height), a CTG correction of 11 years should be added to the mean age of the five sampled trees (with an error of about years). Published in 2006 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
机译:动态的,年轻的(<500年)地貌地貌,特别是火山河流特征的约会,需要比放射性碳测年更高的精度。长期以来,新的地貌的最小年龄早已从新表面生长的最老树的树轮年龄获得。但是,要估算创建地貌的年份,需要对从增量核心获得的树龄进行两次时间校正:(1)新地貌表面的稳定与采样树木的发芽之间的时间间隔(发芽滞后时间或GLT); (2)如果树木没有在地面上取芯,则幼苗发芽和生长到取样高度的间隔。这两个时间间隔的总和就是定植时间间隔(CTG)。为了更精确地确定喀斯喀特山脉低地河谷阶地和洪泛区的年代,需要进行这种时间校正,因为在这种情况下,可能需要数年甚至数十年的时间,才发生喷发引起的横向移动和河道的垂直凝结,而且这种地貌变化的时间可以对应急计划至关重要在低地(<750 m asl)的八个地点采样了最早定居的道格拉斯冷杉(Pseudotsuga menziesii)的树年,最近在三个梯级火山(雷尼尔山,圣海伦斯山和胡德山)附近形成了已知年龄的地表。华盛顿西南部和俄勒冈州西北部。从每个研究地点的最大,最古老的树木上,在胸高处(如果可能)在地面上取增量核心或茎节。除非早期定居者的总数较少,否则每个地点至少采样十棵树。结果表明,如果对年龄不明的表面上生长的最大的(推测为最老的)花旗松进行采样,则GLT的校正应为4年,CTG的校正为10年。这种方法可能会出现长达20年的错误。可以通过对五个最大的花旗松(而非单个最大)进行采样来减少误差。如果树木在地面上取芯,则应将5年GLT校正值添加到标有日期的表面上生长的五棵最大树木的平均年轮数。此校正将有大约几年的误差。如果树木的核心大约为1?在地面以上的高度(乳房高度)m处,应对五棵取样树的平均年龄加上11年的CTG校正(误差大约为几年)。 John Wiley&Sons,Ltd.于2006年出版。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号