...
首页> 外文期刊>Earth Surface Processes and Landforms: The journal of the British Geomorphological Research Group >Performance evaluation of three DEM-based fluvial terrace mapping methods
【24h】

Performance evaluation of three DEM-based fluvial terrace mapping methods

机译:三种基于DEM的河流阶地制图方法的性能评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The availability of high-resolution digital elevation models (DEMs) derived from airborne light detection and ranging (LiDAR) surveys has spurred the development of several methods to identify and map fluvial terraces. The post-glacial landscape of the Sheepscot River watershed, Maine, where land-use change has produced fill terraces upstream of historic dam sites, was selected to implement a comparison between terrace mapping methodologies. At four study sites within the watershed, terraces were manually mapped on LiDAR-DEM-derived hillshade images to facilitate the comparison among fully and semi-automated DEM-based procedures, including: (1) spatial relationships between interpreted terraces and surrounding natural topography, (2) feature classification algorithms, and (3) the TerEx terrace mapping toolbox. Each method was evaluated based on its accuracy and ease of implementation. The four study sites have varying longitudinal slope (0.0008-0.006 m/m), channelwidth (< 5-30 m), surrounding landscape relief (20-80 m), type and density of surrounding land use, and mapped surficial geologic units. All methods generally overestimate terrace areas (average predicted area 210% of manually defined area) with the most accurate results achieved within confined river valleys surrounded by the steep hillslopes. Accuracy generally decreases for study sites surrounded by low-relief landscapes (predicted areas ranged 4-953% of manual delineations). We conclude with the advantages and drawbacks of each method tested and make recommendations for the scenarios where the use of each method is most appropriate. Copyright (C) 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
机译:从机载光检测和测距(LiDAR)调查中获得的高分辨率数字高程模型(DEM)的出现,已刺激了几种识别和绘制河流阶地的方法的发展。选择缅因州的斯科茨河流域的冰川后景观,土地利用的变化在历史大坝遗址的上游产生了填充梯田,以进行梯田制图方法之间的比较。在流域内的四个研究地点,将阶地手动绘制在LiDAR-DEM衍生的山体阴影图像上,以促进基于DEM的全自动和半自动程序之间的比较,包括:(1)阶地与周围自然地形之间的空间关系, (2)要素分类算法,以及(3)TerEx平台映射工具箱。每种方法均基于其准确性和易于实施性进行了评估。这四个研究地点的纵向坡度(0.0008-0.006 m / m),河道宽度(<5-30 m),周围的景观浮雕(20-80 m),周围土地利用的类型和密度以及绘制的表层地质单位都在变化。所有方法通常都会高估梯田面积(平均预测面积为人工定义面积的210%),而在陡峭的山坡所包围的狭窄河谷中会获得最准确的结果。对于被低起伏地貌包围的研究地点,准确性通常会下降(预测区域的范围为人工划定的4-953%)。我们总结了每种测试方法的优缺点,并针对最适合使用每种方法的情况提出了建议。版权所有(C)2016 John Wiley&Sons,Ltd.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号