首页> 外文期刊>Ecology: A Publication of the Ecological Society of America >Grassland fires may favor native over introduced plants by reducing pathogen loads
【24h】

Grassland fires may favor native over introduced plants by reducing pathogen loads

机译:草原大火可能会通过减少病原体负荷而使本地火种胜过引进植物

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Grasslands have been lost and degraded in the United States since Euro- American settlement due to agriculture, development, introduced invasive species, and changes in fire regimes. Fire is frequently used in prairie restoration to control invasion by trees and shrubs, but may have additional consequences. For example, fire might reduce damage by herbivore and pathogen enemies by eliminating litter, which harbors eggs and spores. Less obviously, fire might influence enemy loads differently for native and introduced plant hosts. We used a controlled burn in a Willamette Valley (Oregon) prairie to examine these questions. We expected that, without fire, introduced host plants should have less damage than native host plants because the introduced species are likely to have left many of their enemies behind when they were transported to their new range (the enemy release hypothesis, or ERH). If the ERH holds, then fire, which should temporarily reduce enemies on all species, should give an advantage to the natives because they should see greater total reduction in damage by enemies. Prior to the burn, we censused herbivore and pathogen attack on eight plant species (five of nonnative origin: Bromus hordaceous, Cynosuros echinatus, Galium divaricatum, Schedonorus arundinaceus (=Festuca arundinacea), and Sherardia arvensis; and three natives: Danthonia californica, Epilobium minutum, and Lomatium nudicale). The same plots were monitored for two years post-fire. Prior to the burn, native plants had more kinds of damage and more pathogen damage than introduced plants, consistent with the ERH. Fire reduced pathogen damage relative to the controls more for the native than the introduced species, but the effects on herbivory were negligible. Pathogen attack was correlated with plant reproductive fitness, whereas herbivory was not. These results suggest that fire may be useful for promoting some native plants in prairies due to its negative effects on their pathogens.
机译:自从欧美定居以来,由于农业,发展,引入的入侵物种以及火灾情况的变化,美国的草原已经丧失和退化。大草原恢复中经常使用火势来控制树木和灌木的入侵,但可能会带来其他后果。例如,火势可能会通过消除窝窝中的卵和孢子来减少食草动物和病原体敌人的破坏。不太明显的是,火可能对本地和引进的植物宿主产生不同的敌人负荷影响。我们在俄勒冈州威拉米特山谷的草原上使用了受控烧伤来研究这些问题。我们预计,在没有大火的情况下,引入的寄主植物应比本地寄主的植物遭受更少的损害,因为引入的物种很可能在运输到新的范围时将许多敌人抛在了后面(敌人释放假说或ERH)。如果ERH成立,那么火势将暂时减少所有物种上的敌人,这应该给土著人带来好处,因为他们应该看到更大程度的减少敌人的伤害。在焚烧之前,我们调查了食草动物和病原体对八种植物(五种非本地来源:布鲁姆斯,杜鹃花,紫锥菊,二齿加仑,Schedonorus arundinaceus(= Festuca arundinacea)和Sherardia arvensis)以及三种本地植物:丹白花(Dantholob californica), minutum和Lomatium nudicale)。火灾发生后的两年,对相同的地块进行了监测。燃烧之前,本地植物的危害和病原体的危害要比引入的植物多,这与ERH一致。相对于对照,火种减少了病原体对病原体的损害,而不是引入物种,但对草食性的影响可忽略不计。病原体侵袭与植物生殖适应性相关,而草食性则不相关。这些结果表明,火对大草原上的某些本地植物可能具有促进作用,因为它对其病原体具有负面影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号