首页> 外文期刊>Economic geology and the bulletin of the Society of Economic Geologists >Geology, Geochemistry, and Mineralogy of the Worthington Offset Dike: A Genetic Model for Offset Dike Mineralization in the Sudbury Igneous Complex
【24h】

Geology, Geochemistry, and Mineralogy of the Worthington Offset Dike: A Genetic Model for Offset Dike Mineralization in the Sudbury Igneous Complex

机译:沃辛顿偏移堤防的地质,地球化学和矿物学:萨德伯里火成岩复合体中偏移堤防矿化的遗传模型。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The Worthington offset dike extends for approximately 15 km away from the southwestern margin of the 1.85 Ga Sudbury Igneous Complex. The dike is zoned with respect to inclusion and sulfide contents. Marginal chilled quartz diorite is transitional into medium-grained quarts diorite. These rocks are sulfide undersaturated, contain small inclusions from the wall rocks, and are preserved along much of the dike. Locally, the dike contains a core of inclusion-rich quartz diorite, which can be choked with inclusions surrounded by semimassive to massive sulfide. The more heavily mineralized inclusion-rich quartz diorite contains 10 to 75 percent amphibolite inclusions, which are petrologically and geochemically similar to the immediately adjacent country-rock amphibolites, locally termed "Sudbury gabbros." The semimassive to massive sulfide zones form sub-vertical pipes, much like the deposits of the Copper Cliff offset dike, and these are associated with locations where the Worthington dike widens from 20 to 30 m to 50 to 80 m. The average metal tenors of the sulfide with> = 5 percent sulfur are calculated to be 7 percent Ni and 13 percent Cu. Thus the dike ores have a much higher Cu/Ni ratio than orebodies within the contact sublayer (Cu/Ni approx 1). The medium-grained inclusion-poor quartz diorite and inclusion-rich quartz diorite differ in Ni, Cu, Pt, and Pd abundances, but they have similar major and lithophile trace element abundance levels despite having different inclusion and sulfide contents. Assimilation of inclusions has therefore not significantly changed the composition of the silicate matrix of the inclusion-rich quartz diorite. The composition of the inclusion-poor quartz diorite is a close approximation to average crust and also to the bulk composition of the Sudbury Igneous Complex rocks. Regional differences in offset geochemistry exist between the North and South Range offset dikes, but we believe that the formation of the inclusion-poor quartz diorite and inclusion-rich quartz diorite silicate magmas predated significant silicate differentiation or silicate gravitational segregation of the melt sheet and that the differences may record primary silicate heterogeneity of the melt sheet. These differences may have developed in response to the different proportions of Archean granitoids relative to Proterozoic sediments and volcanics that contributed to the melt sheet on the North and South Ranges of the Sudbury Igneous Complex. The first quartz diorite melt was sulfide undersaturated and devoid of amphibolite inclusions. The introduction of this melt took place during or shortly after the generation of the melt sheet and represented a very rapid introduction of quartz diorite magma into radial and concentric dikes with local incorporation of metasedimentary inclusions. The second phase of activity involved the introduction of a sulfide-bearing melt into portions of the quartz diorite melt that were not completely crystallized at the center of the offset dike; this produced the inclusion-rich quartz diorite. The main control on the location of injection of the sulfide-bearing melt appears to be widened domains of the partially crystallized quartz diorite dike that often correspond to contacts between different country-rock types and sulfides, especially where there are Sudbury gab-bro country rocks and/or local development of Sudbury breccia. The injection of sulfide-enriched melt is interpreted to have taken place along steeply oriented pipes through these heavily brecciated country rocks; this appears to explain why there is a contact relationship between inclusion-rich quartz diorite and inclusion-poor quartz diorite, and also explains the presence of fragments of inclusion-poor quartz diorite and country-rock amphibolites in the inclusion-rich quartz diorite. The introduction of sulfides into these pipes is interpreted to have taken place from the overlying melt sheet and it is suggested that the high Cu/Ni rati
机译:沃辛顿偏移堤防距离1.85 Ga萨德伯里火成岩群的西南边缘约15公里。堤的夹杂物和硫化物含量是按区域划分的。边缘冷却的石英闪长岩转变为中等粒度的夸脱闪长岩。这些岩石是硫化物欠饱和的,包含来自围岩的少量夹杂物,并且沿堤坝的大部分被保存下来。在当地,堤坝包含一个内含物丰富的石英闪长岩的芯,可以将其夹杂物包围,将其包裹在半块状至块状硫化物中。矿化程度更高的富含夹杂物的石英闪长岩包含10%至75%的角闪石包裹体,在岩石学和地球化学上类似于紧邻的乡村岩石角闪石,在当地被称为“ Sudbury gabbros”。半块状到块状硫化物带形成亚垂直管道,非常类似于铜崖偏置堤坝的沉积物,这些区域与沃辛顿堤坝从20至30 m加宽至50至80 m的位置有关。计算出硫含量大于等于5%的硫化物的平均金属期限为7%的镍和13%的铜。因此,堤坝矿石的铜/镍比要比接触子层内的矿石高得多(铜/镍约为1)。 Ni,Cu,Pt和Pd的中等粒度夹杂物贫乏的石英闪长岩和富集夹杂物的石英闪长岩不同,但尽管它们具有不同的夹杂物和硫化物含量,但它们具有相似的主要和亲石性痕量元素丰度水平。因此,夹杂物的同化并没有显着改变富含夹杂物的石英闪长岩的硅酸盐基质的组成。夹杂物少的石英闪长岩的组成非常接近于平均地壳,也非常接近萨德伯里火成岩复杂岩石的整体组成。北部和南部山脉的偏移堤坝之间存在偏移地球化学的区域差异,但我们认为,夹杂物含量低的石英闪长岩和富夹杂物的石英重晶石硅酸盐岩浆形成早于熔片的明显的硅酸盐分化或硅酸盐重力偏析,并且差异可能记录了熔体片的原始硅酸盐异质性。这些差异可能是由于太古代花岗岩相对于元古代沉积物和火山的比例不同而产生的,这些比例导致了萨德伯里火成岩复杂地带的南北熔融带。第一个石英闪长岩熔体为硫化物欠饱和且不含闪石夹杂物。这种熔体的引入是在熔体片生成过程中或之后不久发生的,这代表着石英闪长岩岩浆非常迅速地引入了局部沉积的夹杂物夹杂的径向和同心堤中。活性的第二阶段涉及将含硫化物的熔体引入石英二叠氮化物熔体的未在偏置堤坝中心完全结晶的部分。这产生了富夹杂物的石英闪长岩。含硫化物熔体注入位置的主要控制似乎是部分结晶的石英闪长岩堤的域扩大,这通常对应于不同的乡村岩石类型和硫化物之间的接触,特别是在有萨德伯里盖布兄弟乡村岩石的地方和/或萨德伯里角砾岩的局部发育。富含硫化物的熔体的注入被认为是沿着陡峭的管道穿过这些严重角砾化的乡村岩石。这似乎可以解释为什么富含夹杂物的石英闪长岩和贫乏夹杂物的石英闪长岩之间存在接触关系,也解释了富含夹杂物的石英闪长岩中贫夹杂物的石英闪长岩和乡村岩石闪石的碎片的存在。硫化物被引入这些管道的原因是上覆的熔融金属板发生了,并且建议高Cu / Ni比

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号