首页> 外文期刊>Echocardiography. >Contrast echocardiography improves interobserver agreement for wall motion score index and correlation with ejection fraction.
【24h】

Contrast echocardiography improves interobserver agreement for wall motion score index and correlation with ejection fraction.

机译:对比超声心动图改善了观察者之间的壁运动评分指数以及与射血分数的相关性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: The wall motion score index (WMSI) is a surrogate for left ventricular ejection fraction (LV-EF), which becomes unreliable in poor echo windows. The value of contrast LV opacification (LVO) for WMSI assessment is not well known. OBJECTIVES: We sought to compare interobserver agreement for WMSI and the correlation between the LVO-WMSI and LV-EF using two-dimensional second harmonic (SH) and LVO echocardiography. METHODS: The study comprised 100 consecutive patients (57 +/- 13 years, 85% males). Two independent physicians assessed LV segmental quality and wall motion for both the SH and LVO studies according to a 17-segment model. Systolic wall motion was defined as: normokinesia, hypokinesia (systolic inward endocardial motion <7 mm), akinesia, and dyskinesia. LV-EF was assessed from the LVO images according to the biplane modified Simpson's method. RESULTS: Of the 1,700 analyzed segments, 453 (26.6%) were poorly visualized with SH imaging, and 173 (10.2%) with LVO (P < 0.0001). The two observers agreed on segmental wall motion score in 1,299 segments (agreement 76%, Kappa 0.60) with SH imaging and in 1,491 segments (agreement 88%, Kappa 0.78) with LVO. Interobserver correlation (r(2) ) was 0.86 for the SH-WMSI and 0.93 for the LVO-WMSI. The limits-of-agreement for interobserver LVO-WMSI (mean difference -1.0%+/- 6.8%, agreement -14.6%, 12.6%) was lower than that for SH-WMSI (mean difference -2.3%+/- 10.1%, agreement -22.5, 17.9). The LVO-WMSI correlated well with LV-EF (r(2) = 0.71). LV-EF could be estimated according to the formula 1.01 - 0.32 x WMSI. CONCLUSION: Echo-contrast improves interobserver agreement for wall motion scoring and the WMSI. The LVO-imaged WMSI correlates well with LV-EF.
机译:背景:壁运动评分指数(WMSI)是左心室射血分数(LV-EF)的替代指标,左心室射血分数在不良的回声窗中变得不可靠。用于WMSI评估的造影剂左旋混浊(LVO)的价值尚不清楚。目的:我们试图比较使用二维二次谐波(SH)和LVO超声心动图对WMSI的观察者之间的一致性以及LVO-WMSI和LV-EF之间的相关性。方法:该研究包括100名连续患者(57 +/- 13岁,男性85%)。两位独立的医生根据17段模型评估了SH和LVO研究的左心室质量和壁运动。收缩期壁运动定义为:运动异常,运动减退(收缩内向心内膜运动<7 mm),运动障碍和运动障碍。根据双翼飞机改进的Simpson方法,从LVO图像评估LV-EF。结果:在分析的1,700个部分中,有453个(26.6%)的SH成像可视性差,而173个(10.2%)的LVO成像(P <0.0001)。两名观察员同意SH成像在1,299个节段(同意度为76%,Kappa为0.60)和LVO在1,491个节段(同意度为88%,Kappa 0.78)中对节段壁运动评分达成了一致。观察者之间的相关性(r(2))对于SH-WMSI为0.86,对于LVO-WMSI为0.93。观察者间LVO-WMSI的协议范围(平均差异-1.0%+ /-6.8%,协议-14.6%,12.6%)低于SH-WMSI的协议范围(平均差异-2.3%+ /-10.1%) ,协议-22.5,17.9)。 LVO-WMSI与LV-EF相关性很好(r(2)= 0.71)。 LV-EF可以根据公式1.01- 0.32 x WMSI进行估算。结论:回声对比度改善了壁间运动评分和WMSI的观察者间一致性。 LVO成像的WMSI与LV-EF相关性很好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号