...
首页> 外文期刊>Earth and Planetary Science Letters: A Letter Journal Devoted to the Development in Time of the Earth and Planetary System >Impact of riser reconstructions on estimation of secular variation in rates of strike-slip faulting: Revisiting the Cherchen River site along the Altyn Tagh Fault, NW China
【24h】

Impact of riser reconstructions on estimation of secular variation in rates of strike-slip faulting: Revisiting the Cherchen River site along the Altyn Tagh Fault, NW China

机译:冒口重建对走滑断层率长期变化估计的影响:沿西北部阿尔金·塔格断裂带的车尔琴河站点再造

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Slip rates are heavily contested for many of the first-order strike-slip faults within the Indo-Asian collision zone. Rates determined geodetically are generally lower than those reported using reconstructions of offset landforms, and it is unclear if this discrepancy reflects true secular variation in slip history, systematic errors in interpretation, or both. Here I examine the methods used to derive slip rates from reconstructions of displaced fluvial risers, and show that such rates are subject to potentially important uncertainties that have largely been overlooked. Review of published data demonstrates that the slip rate can vary by a factor of 1.2 to 5 for the same site, depending on whether the reconstruction uses the age of the upper or lower terrace for the initiation of riser offset. To reduce this epistemic uncertainty, I have developed six geomorphic indices that can be used to identify the most accurate end-member reconstruction: (1) comparison of riser offset with inset channel width; (2) similarity of riser and tread displacements; (3) morphological analysis of the scarp profile; (4) riser deflection in plan view; (5) diachroneity of terrace abandonment; and (6) whether riser crests or bases yield the slip vector. Without the use of these geomorphic observations the epistemic uncertainty associated with current methods for determining slip rate from offset fluvial risers is likely to be so large that there is no resolvable discrepancy between the GPS and geologic rates within the Indo-Asian collision zone. Application of three of these indices to new field mapping of the Cherchen He (River) Site (similar to 86.4 degrees E) along the central Altyn Tagh Fault yields a revised slip rate of 9.4 +/- 2.3 mm/yr, equivalent within error to the rates previously derived from GPS and paleoseismic studies. Although reinterpretation of published data from the Sulamu Tagh site (similar to 87.4 degrees) is consistent with this revised rate, additional work is needed to reconcile this result with some of the rates reported near Aksay (similar to 94 degrees E). (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:在印度洋-亚洲碰撞带内,许多一阶走滑断层都对滑移率进行了激烈的争论。大地测量法确定的速率通常低于使用偏移地貌重建报告的速率,目前尚不清楚这种差异是否反映了滑坡历史的真实长期变化,解释的系统误差或两者兼而有之。在这里,我研究了用于从流离失所的河流立管的重建中得出滑移率的方法,并表明,这种滑移率存在潜在的重要不确定性,而这些不确定性在很大程度上被忽略了。审查公开的数据表明,对于同一位置,滑移率的变化范围为1.2到5,这取决于重建工作是使用上层平台还是下层平台的年龄来引发立管偏移。为了减少这种认识上的不确定性,我开发了六个可用于识别最准确的端部构件重建的地貌指标:(1)立管偏移量与插入通道宽度的比较; (2)立管和胎面位移的相似性; (3)陡峭轮廓的形态分析; (4)立管在平面图中的偏转; (五)梯田遗弃的; (6)立管的波峰或波谷产生滑移矢量。如果不使用这些地貌观测资料,与当前确定偏移河道立管滑移率的方法相关的认识论不确定性可能会很大,以至于印度洋与亚洲碰撞带内的GPS与地质率之间没有可解决的差异。将这些指数中的三个应用于沿Altyn Tagh断层中央的Cherchen He(河)站点(类似于E的86.4度)的新场测绘,得出的修正滑移率为9.4 +/- 2.3 mm / yr,在误差范围内相当于以前从GPS和古地震研究得出的比率。尽管从苏拉木·塔格(Sulamu Tagh)站点(约87.4度)对已发布数据的重新解释与该修正率一致,但仍需要进一步的工作来使这一结果与阿克赛附近报道的某些率(约94度东经)保持一致。 (c)2006 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号